Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

News

Opinion | It’s not up for debate

By U.S. Rep. Martha Roby

45 years ago this month, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled in Roe v. Wade to make abortion legal and available nationwide. While many abortion activists celebrate this infamous anniversary, it represents a particularly somber occasion for those of us who advocate for life – at all stages.

Every year since this ruling, the pro-life community has gathered in Washington to march in peaceful protest. The 2018 March for Life took place on Friday, January 19th – and wow, the pro-life energy was certainly high in Washington.

This year the March for Life theme was “Love Saves Lives.” Leading up to and during the March, the pro-life community participated in a social media campaign to share photos, videos, and thoughts to shed light on why we march – and on the many reasons why life at every stage is worth fighting for.

I’d like to extend a very sincere “thank you” to each and every person from our great state who made the long trip to participate in the March. I am truly inspired by the thousands of March for Life participants and their dedication to the pro-life movement. I stand with you.

I was especially impressed by a young lady from Montgomery named Agnes Armstrong. She’s a graduate of the Montgomery Catholic Preparatory School and is currently a sophomore at Auburn University. She was selected to speak to more than 600,000 people at the pre-March rally to offer the perspective of a young female college student.

This past summer, Agnes wrote a letter to March for Life President Jeanne Mancini thanking her for the impact the organization has made. Mrs. Mancini was moved by the letter and asked Agnes to be featured as this year’s March for Life “Young Adult” keynote speaker. I am so thankful to have young leaders like Agnes to represent our state in such a remarkable way. It’s because of individuals like her that our pro-life momentum is as strong as it is.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

I am excited to report that during the March for Life festivities, the House took action to defend the defenseless by taking up and passing HR4712, the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act. I was proud to cosponsor the legislation, and I also had the unique opportunity to manage debate of the bill while it was being considered on the floor.

At this point, I don’t think it’s a secret that I am unapologetically pro-life, and I believe that our laws and policies should assign the utmost importance to life at every stage. I have stood on the House floor many times in defense of the unborn, but this time, we weren’t talking about the unborn. H.R. 4712 seeks to protect those who have already been born.

The bill is pretty simple. It states that if a baby is born alive after a failed abortion, he or she must be given the same exact medical care that would be given to any other baby. I know Congress will continue to play politics about when life begins and argue about the point at which the law should step in to protect it – and I understand not everyone agrees with my strong pro-life stance. However, I cannot fathom how any person could be opposed to legislation that protects babies who are so alive that you can look them in the eye.

Of course, I supported this measure, but it did feel strange to take a stand in defense of living, breathing children – to even have to make the case that a baby who survives an abortion and is born in this world should be treated just like a baby born any other way. Unfortunately, I didn’t have a choice. There is currently no law mandating that a baby born alive after a failed abortion receives medical treatment instead of being left to die.

That’s why this bill is necessary. It would require under federal law, nationwide, that a baby born alive after an abortion attempt receives the same care that any other baby would. I know that as a Member of Congress, part of my job is to debate the issues facing our nation, and while I take this responsibility very seriously, I don’t believe this particular issue is up for debate. I hope the Senate acts swiftly and passes this bill, and I’ll keep you informed as we progress.

Martha Roby represents Alabama’s Second Congressional District. She lives in Montgomery, Alabama with her husband Riley and their two children.

More from APR

National

The U.S. Supreme Court now faces immense pressure to address this controversial case expeditiously.

National

Three families from Tennessee are urging SCOTUS to declare a Tennessee law similar to Alabama's unconstitutional.

Elections

The new endorsements include judicial seats on the Supreme Court and the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals.

Courts

Much of the response argues the map put forth by the state plainly fails to remedy issues with the prior map.