Connect with us

National

Shelby’s subcommittee reviews U.S. Navy and Marine Corps budget request

Brandon Moseley

Published

on

Tuesday, U.S. Senator Richard Shelby, R-Alabama, conducted a subcommittee hearing to review the Fiscal Year 2019 budget request for the U.S. Navy and U.S. Marine Corps.

Secretary of the Navy Richard Spencer, Admiral John Richardson and Marine Corps Commandant General Robert Neller all appeared before Shelby’s committee for an update of U.S. Naval operations, and to review the fiscal year 2019 budget request for the Navy and Marine Corps.

“For fiscal year 2019, the Navy and Marine Corps are requesting $194.1 billion, which is an increase of about $4.5 billion over amounts appropriated for fiscal year 2018, and is consistent with the two-year budget deal passed earlier this year,” Chairman Shelby said. “However, the funding level in this request is still below what the Navy had projected for the upcoming year before the Budget Control Act was passed in 2011.”

Advertisement

“Secretary Mattis has warned that ‘failure to modernize our military risks leaving us with a force that could dominate the last war, but be irrelevant to tomorrow’s security,’” Shelby said. “This increase is a necessary first step to reverse the harm to our military by five years of sequestration budgets. Today there are over 100,000 sailors and Marines and more than 100 ships forward deployed – including three aircraft carriers and three Amphibious Assault Ships.”

“Our nation has tasked our Navy and Marine Corps with assuring access to the world’s oceans and far-away regions, while defending our interests in those areas, protecting U.S. citizens across the globe, and preventing adversaries from using the worlds’ oceans against the United States,” Shelby continued.

“Gentlemen, we look forward to your testimony and working with you during the appropriations process to meet the needs of the Department of the Navy in an increasingly complex strategic environment,” Shelby concluded.

Neller and Richardson warned Congress that American no longer has undisputed mastery of the seas if we were at war with China and Russia.

General Neller wrote in submitted testimony, “The ascendant threats posed by revisionist powers and rogue states require change – we must become more lethal, resilient and as a consequence, a more capable deterrent. The Navy-Marine Corps team can no longer rely on concepts and capabilities premised on uncontested sea control.”

Sec. Spencer said, “The strategic environment is rapidly changing and the Navy and Marine Corps is engaged in a competition that they have not faced in over twenty years.”

Senator Shelby is the chairman of the Senate Appropriations Committee and its Subcommittee on Defense.

(Original reporting by Nationalinterest.org contributed to this report.)

Continue Reading

National

Byrne, Brooks call on Mueller to “wrap up” investigation

Brandon Moseley

Published

on

Congressman Bradley Byrne, R-Montrose, said that Special Counsel Robert Mueller has accomplished very little and said it is time to wrap up the investigation.

Congressman Mo Brooks, R-Huntsville, said that the investigation should not continue past July.

Congressman Byrne said, “It has been one year since Robert Mueller was appointed to investigate Russian collusion related to the 2016 presidential election and very little has been accomplished. It is time for Mr. Mueller to wrap up his investigation.

Advertisement

On Thursday, Representative Brooks went on CSPAN.

“I just want him to do his job,” Brooks said on TV. “Finish it. We cannot have this ongoing for years and years and years. It’s a distraction to our country. It interferes with our ability to address a lot of serious policy challenges that we face, and that’s in Congress. Imagine what it’s like in the White House where you’re having to look over your shoulder, where you have the FBI that is doing – you know if something was wrong, you’ve had two years now come July 5th that the FBI has been involved. Do your job. Finish it.”

“Mr. Mueller has a large team of lawyers and has spent millions of dollars over the past year, yet there still is no indication of illegal Russian collusion,” Byrne said. “While this constant drama of targeted leaks and far-flung investigations may be good for the national news media and liberal fundraising, it is not good for our country.”

The CSPAN host asked Brooks: “Robert Mueller appointed by Rod Rosenstein a year ago today on May 17th, 2017. Since then, 19 people including four Trump associates and three companies have been indicted from his investigation, five have pled guilty, 13 of those who have been charged are Russians accused of meddling in the elections. You were a former prosecutor in the Tuscaloosa DA’s office before…”

Brooks: “And the Madison County District Attorney’s office.”

C-SPAN: “…before coming to Congress. Is that not a good track record for a year’s worth of investigation?”

Brooks: “Well, you’re limiting it to Mueller. I’m talking about the big picture, and the big picture is two years. You know sometimes you’re not able to figure out who committed a crime— you know a crime has been committed— a murder or a robbery or what have you and the trail has gone dry and you haven’t been able to ascertain who the culprit is and you stop your investigation. It may reopen if something in the future pops up that suggests, hey, this is the person who did it. But we never had an ongoing investigation of a particular person that lasted anywhere near that length of time. Now, granted, this may be more complicated than most investigations. But two years, given all the resources of the Justice Department, given all the resources of the FBI, given the resources of everybody else who may have been involved in that, that’s plenty of time to conduct an investigation. Now keep in mind, I’m talking about two years to do the investigation— once you’ve got your cards laid out on the table, you’ve got your arrest warrants, you’ve got your indictments, take whatever time it needs to prosecute them in court but get the investigation done because it’s interfering. This is not a normal type of alleged crime and investigation and a prosecution. Normally, that’s very limited and has virtually no impact on our country. But, right now, this going on indefinitely is having a significant— in my judgment— having a significant adverse effect on the ability of the United States government to properly function and properly do its job, particularly at the Executive Branch, particularly at the White House level.”

“Ensuring the integrity of our elections and upholding the rule of law are both critically important and noble causes, but after a year the time has come for Mr. Mueller to either put forward a case or move on,” Byrne said.

Congress is increasingly putting pressure on Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein to end the Mueller investigation. To this point Rosenstein has resisted that pressure.

Both Congressmen Bradley Byrne and Mo Brooks are running for re-election. Byrne has no Republican opponent in the coming primary, while Brooks faces a primary challenger from veteran Clayton Hinchman. The Republican Primary will be on June 5.

Continue Reading

National

Alabama GOP denounces Jones for voting no on Haspel

Sam Mattison

Published

on

The Alabama GOP rebuked Sen. Doug Jones, the state’s Democratic senator, over his no vote on a CIA director nominee that has drawn the ire of senators from both parties.

Jones signaled through a statement this week that he would vote no on the CIA nominee Gina Haspel’s confirmation. His reasoning was mostly based on Haspel’s answer to the question of whether she thought an enhanced interrogation program was immoral.

“While her career has been impressive, Ms. Haspel’s role in programs that conducted torture is very troubling; her refusal to acknowledge the immorality of such conduct even today with the benefit of hindsight is even more so and reflects poorly on our nation’s reputation as a moral leader in the world,” Jones said through a statement.

Advertisement

The Alabama GOP, who have been critical of some of Jones’ moves while in the Senate, denounced the senator’s move.

Terry Lathan, chairman of the Alabama GOP, said that Haspel is a qualified candidate who is “deserving of a confirmation by the U.S. Senate.”

“In voting no to confirm Gina Haspel, Senator Jones is choosing to put partisanship over our nation’s security,” Lathan said. “Alabama voters will remember this when they head to the polls to choose their next U.S. Senator in 2020.”

Since Jones has taken office, the Alabama GOP has constantly reminded him of his pending election in 2020.

Jones narrowly won the seat in a Special Election in December after his opponent, former Supreme Court Chief Justice Roy Moore, faced a great backlash for allegations of sexual misconduct and dating teenagers nearly four decades ago.

Haspel, however, will face a vote soon in the Senate, and it is clear that she will win a nomination despite the opposition of most of the Democrats and a few influential Republicans.

Sen. John McCain, Republican from Arizona, was the most prominent in his denouncement.

“I believe Gina Haspel is a patriot who loves our country and has devoted her professional life to its service and defense,” McCain said. “However, Ms. Haspel’s role in overseeing the use of torture by Americans is disturbing. Her refusal to acknowledge torture’s immorality is disqualifying.”

Haspel’s role in a secret prison in Thailand and her involvement with a controversial program that used enhanced interrogation techniques has become a linchpin of opposition for the nominee.The program, a product of post 9/11 policies, used techniques to interrogate prisoners that some advocates call torture.

One allegation is that Haspel destroyed video tapes of interrogations conducted on Al-Qaeda suspects.

When asked about the program, Haspel said she would not continue the program if confirmed as director. She reiterated that point in a letter to Virginia Democrat Sen. Mark Warner on Wednesday when she said the program should have never been conducted.

The Senate Intelligence Committee confirmed Haspel on Wednesday, and she will now go before the full Senate.

Continue Reading

National

Ivey backs Nobel Peace Prize for Trump

Sam Mattison

Published

on

Gov. Kay Ivey threw her support behind President Donald Trump’s nomination for a Nobel Peace Prize through a letter on Tuesday.

Ivey singed the letter to the Nobel Committee along with six other governors supporting the president’s nomination.

“Though he has only been in office one year, President Trump has achieved an unprecedented victory for global peace and security,” the letter read.

Advertisement

Ivey gave her own comments over Twitter.

“He is due to be honored for his ability to bring everyone to the table to discuss a way which offers the Korean Peninsula & world a path to peace,” Ivey said on Twitter.

Ivey is not alone in the calls for the president to receive a prize and even South Korean officials have credited Trump’s policies to pressuring North Korea into a peace talk.

Trump himself has declined to say if he should receive the award, but did say he wanted “victory for the world” in the Oval Office last Wednesday.

The Korean Peninsula has recently seen an era of peace after a period of tensions over North Korea’s nuclear program. Last year, North Korea successfully tested a hydrogen bomb and they have launched missiles over Japan.

Trump’s initial response was hawkish insisting that the United States would destroy North Korea if it continued hostilities and even gave North Korea’s leader Kim Jong-un the nickname “rocket man.”

Over the past 5 months, however, the two Koreas have come closer to peace with the two countries even competing in the Winter Olympics over the same flag.

Recently, Kim Jong-un visited South Korea for peace talks, and Trump is scheduled to talk to him in Singapore in June.

Continue Reading

Authors

Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement

Trending

Shelby’s subcommittee reviews U.S. Navy and Marine Corps budget request

by Brandon Moseley Read Time: 2 min
0