Connect with us

Featured Columnists

Opinion | The worst candidate in Alabama

Josh Moon

Published

on

It takes some real effort to be the worst candidate for the state Legislature in Alabama.

Our State House is typically filled with more crooks than a roadside trash crew and enough brain power to make a pocket flashlight flicker. I mean, let’s remember that this bunch, just three years ago, voted nearly unanimously to re-elect as speaker a guy who had just been indicted on 23 felony counts. (He was eventually convicted on 12 of them.)

So, being the worst candidate for office in this state is a pretty high bar. Or maybe it’s a low bar.

Whatever. I have this year’s winner, and it’s not close.

Meet: Northport’s Rodney Sullivan.

Advertisement

If you’ve never heard of Sullivan, that’s because he’s selfishly confined his style of aggressive governance to the Northport City Council the last several years. He decided this was the year to spread his wings, and he’s looking for your vote for the House District 61 seat.

That seat has been held for the past 12 years by Republican Alan Harper, who you might remember not-so-fondly for his racist tirade on Facebook in 2015 against non-American business owners. It was so super-duper racist that even the Alabama Republican Party leadership — which has rarely encountered an instance of a party member’s racism that didn’t help the brand — was forced to admonish Harper publicly.  

I bring all of that up only to make this point: Sullivan would be WORSE than that guy!

If you’re not into reading, let me give you the quick political bio of Sullivan: stands accused of rape, assaulted his opponent for his council seat, assaulted the mayor of Northport, was part of a scheme to fire the city manager so the council could give the job to Harper (and make room for Sullivan to run for election) and was accused in a city audit of violating the state’s Open Meetings Act law to concoct the wrongful termination.

In other words: He’ll fit in great among Republicans in the State House.

I have no idea how this guy is on a ballot.

Seriously, the GOP refused to certify another candidate earlier this year after discovering some old, racist Facebook posts and some sketchy personal finances. It was probably the right move.

But that guy hadn’t assaulted anyone. Much less two people.

And yet, Sullivan remains.

The cost of that decision to leave him certified by ALGOP were felt last week, when fliers landed in the mailboxes of District 61 voters showing the University of Alabama Campus Police report which accused Sullivan of 1st degree rape. The fliers also featured ALGOP chairwoman Terry Lathan’s picture and asked voters to call her and ask why Sullivan is still on the ballot.

It’s worth mentioning, too, that the rape allegation wasn’t new. It was filed back in May, but several sources said UA PD couldn’t get the victim to cooperate further and she refused to press charges.

Even more odd, sources said: the fliers were not produced by Democrats or anyone working to aid the campaign of Sullivan’s opponent, Thomas Hyche. Instead, they appear to be produced by a group, Committee for Good Government, that has Republican ties.

Maybe they’re concerned that Sullivan will not be good for government. He certainly hasn’t been so far.

In 2012, following a candidate forum at a local civic center in Northport, Sullivan was allegedly assaulted his his opponent for that seat, Chuck Gerdau. Gerdau said Sullivan hit him twice in the chest with a closed fist — an assault Gerdau believed was meant to intimidate him into dropping out of the race.

Former Northport Mayor Harvey Fretwell also said Sullivan assaulted him after discovering that Fretwell was planning to support Gerdau. Maybe the plan was to beat an endorsement out of Fretwell.

None of it mattered, because Sullivan still managed to win the seat.

And he repaid voters by allegedly taking part in a scam to give Harper the city manager’s job. A scam that was so blatant and ridiculous that the firm that has conducted the city’s annual audit for years risked angering the council by citing the violations in its annual audit report.

So, if you’re scoring at home, that’s: rape (allegations), assault times two, ethics violations and violations of the Open Meetings Act.

  Even for ALGOP, which could start a prison football team at this point, Sullivan is notably bad.

In fact, he’s the worst.

 

Continue Reading

Bill Britt

Opinion | Will Republicans bring change or status quo?

Bill Britt

Published

on

For eight years, Republicans have dominated state government in Alabama, but those years are not a fair representation of Republican leadership because, for most of that time, corrupt, crazy or compromised men were at the helms in the State House, the governor’s office and throughout the political infrastructure.

Already, Republicans are laying the groundwork for the next four years by determining who will staff the governor’s office and cabinet, the committee chairs in the House and Senate and key leadership roles within the caucus. Those choices will show whether there will be a change in character, conduct, and competence or status quo.

Beginning in 2008, then-Gov. Bob Riley, ALGOP Chair and minority leader Mike Hubbard, along with BCA’s Billy Canary, began to methodically execute a plan to take control of Alabama’s political structure. While they personally failed due to greed and incompetence, their plan succeeded and even today, after Hubbard’s felony conviction and Canary’s ouster at BCA, many of their handpicked legislators, cronies and co-conspirators still enjoy dominant positions in government and the accompanying political apparatus.

Reportedly, Riley is laying low but will seek a comeback in the run-up to the 2020 U.S. Senate election, positioning either himself or his son Rob to take on Democrat U.S. Senator Doug Jones.

A scan of Hubbard’s book, “Storming the State House,” offers a look at those candidates who Hubbard, Riley and Canary selected and groomed to do their bidding. Some of their staunchest allies have either quit government or have been indicted or convicted, but still many remain.

Advertisement

Some have changed horses, but not everyone is happy that their former masters do not still hold the reins.

Some miss Hubbard’s whip hand, Riley’s conniving and Canary’s money and outsized influence.

The Republican House caucus will meet Tuesday to determine key leadership roles.

Current Speaker of the House Mac McCutcheon will not face a challenge even though there are some among his ranks who would like to return to a Hubbard-style leadership.

Rep. David Standridge has put his name forward for House Pro Tem, a position presently held by Rep. Victor Gaston. Standridge, it is believed, wants to bring new life into the position, however, Gaston is a well-known fixture. What is unclear is why U.S. Congressman Mike Rogers is lobbying for Gaston’s return as Pro Tem?

It is not sure if House Majority Leader Nathaniel Ledbetter will face opposition or if he should.

Where the rubber wheel hits the road is with committee leadership assignments that will come later. Several committees are still chaired by Hubbard loyalists who, again, long for his dictatorial command. Even the House Ethics Committee is currently headed by a man who believes Hubbard’s conviction was a grave conspiracy involving prosecutorial misconduct.

Over at the Capitol, Gov. Ivey’s staff and cabinet have well placed Hubbard and Rileyites, but there are no signs that Gov. Ivey will replace them.

Most troublesome are rumors that Ivey’s Chief of Staff Steve Pelham is leaving to take a post at Auburn University. No one can blame Pelham given the enormous burden of guiding the office for nearly two years, but replacing him will be a difficult task.

As for the Senate, President Pro Tem Del Marsh will continue his business management approach with few surprises in store. There are rumors of some significant changes, especially among budget chair assignments, but even that is mere speculation at this point.

Republicans have an opportunity to show their governing abilities beginning with its choice of leadership. This is extremely important because Republicans overwhelmingly control every office in state government. Moral, effective leaders are always essential but never more so than when there is no opposition.

If Republicans do not put forward honest leaders, they will be forced at some point in time to look around and say, “We have seen the enemy, and it is us.”

As President Harry Truman noted, “Men make history and not the other way around. In periods where there is no leadership, society stands still. Progress occurs when courageous, skillful leaders seize the opportunity to change things for the better.”

The people of Alabama have selected a Republican super-majority to lead the state. Let’s pray they are ready to prove the people were right.

 

Continue Reading

Featured Columnists

Opinion | It’s time to end Veteran’s Day

Josh Moon

Published

on

Forget Veteran’s Day.

We need a Veteran’s Month.

Every year, as November 11 rolls around, and the parades start slowly marching and the wreaths get laid on graves and everyone seeks out a veteran to thank for their service, I can’t help but think how completely disingenuous it all is.

Seriously, it’s noise.

Tomorrow, the day after Veteran’s Day, most of this country will go back to not giving a damn about veterans or their many, many problems.

Advertisement

One day we’re tying ribbons on trees. The next we’re stepping over homeless vets on the sidewalk.

Maybe if we had a little more time each year — breast cancer, alcoholism and diabetes all get a month — maybe we could actually address a few problems, raise a little money, have enough time to get really, really ticked off about the way we — along with our federal government — consistently fail these men and women.

Because we do fail them.

And nowhere more so than with their health care.

We’ve got billions upon billions to waste on jets that the Air Force doesn’t even want, but we consistently cut and trim the health care services provided to the men and women who fought to protect us.

(And for just a moment, I want you to consider what “fought to protect us” actually means. Because it gets tossed around easily. But the reality is that many, many of these folks flew into a sandy/mountainous/jungle/Nazi-infested hellhole, tiptoed around roadside bombs, ducked enemy gunfire, and generally lived scared out of their ever-lovin’ minds every minute of every day for YEARS on end.)

And failing on veterans’ health care is not a partisan thing. Every recent administration and every recent Congress have done it.

President Obama included cuts to some benefits in Obamacare. Trump proposed cuts in his budget. George W. Bush made cuts, while two wars were still being fought. Clinton made cuts.

This functional indifference is a relatively new thing in this country. Following WWII, a country that had been scared to death gladly gave returning soldiers the rewards they deserved, primarily through the G.I. Bill.

Housing. Cheap loans. College tuition. Entire neighborhoods (unless you were black, of course). And no expenses were spared when it came to treating the returning wounded.

Much of that healthcare was provided by the newly consolidated Veterans Administration, or VA. And some of those hospitals would become world-class centers for care.

Today, many of them are world-class centers of embarrassment.

I know. I’ve written the stories. I’ve followed veterans and their family members around as they tried desperately to get the care promised. Or to simply get a doctor to show up for an appointment inside of a year.

I could tell you stories that would blow your mind.

Like the time a VA doctor and nurse left an 85-year-old Korean War vet lying on the floor, gasping for air, for more than 15 minutes. They saw him, left the room, and didn’t return.

Or the time a VA administrator took a patient to a crack house.

Or the many times VA workers spoke up about patients having to wait YEARS for an appointment, only to have top brass retaliate against them. As former soldiers died waiting.

That’s what we’ve done. Democrats, Republicans, Alabamians, liberals, conservatives, independents — all of us.

And for God’s sakes, don’t even get me started on mental health care, or the lack thereof. It’s a national crisis all by itself. And as last week’s shooting in California indicates, it’s not getting any better.

But you know what makes it all even worse?

The promise on the front end.

That slap-on-the-back promise made to the volunteer heroes heading off to war that if they’d go fight so we don’t have to, we would pick up the tabs, no matter the cost. You go fight our wars, keep us free and safe, and we’ll pay for your health care.

That was the deal we made.

They upheld their end. But like a bunch of used car salesmen, we’ve tried every shady trick in the book to weasel out of ours.

Instead, we give them one day each year, when we close up the banks and government offices, let kids out of school and walk around thanking vets for their service. And while that’s nice and all, it’s just not enough.

Maybe if we had a month, we could actually make good on a few of these promises.

 

Continue Reading

Featured Columnists

Opinion | With last minute move, Sessions cements his awful legacy

Josh Moon

Published

on

Here come the rewrites of Jeff Sessions’ pathetic history.

Already, the apologists and conservatives have begun to mold Sessions’ as a rule-of-law stalwart, a steadying force, a letter-of-the-law stickler for truth and justice.

He stood up to Trump.

He protected Robert Mueller.

He was brave and honorable and dignified, and most of all, he followed the letter of the law, because Jeff Sessions is a good person.

Advertisement

Here’s the truth about Jeff Sessions: He’s a horrible person who has no qualms about laws being broken or U.S. citizens being abused and tortured and wrongly imprisoned, and innocent men being put to death, so long as the victims of those atrocities are not white.

The damage he did at the U.S. Department of Justice will take a generation to undo. And he made sure to do more on his way out the door.

In a sign of just how awful and vindictive and racist he is, in one of his last acts, as he was being dragged out the door towards his North Korea-like forced-applause send-off, Sessions signed a memorandum that, according to the New York Times, sharply limits the use of consent decrees to curb police misconduct.

Those decrees — reached after investigations uncover abuses in police departments and enforced by federal courts — have been used in recent times to address departments with long, sordid histories of abuses, particularly abuses of poor and minority citizens.

The decrees are essentially agreements between the Department of Justice and the departments in question, and they require the departments to make broad changes and show improvements.

For example, in Baltimore, following a number of well-documented scandals, including the death of Freddie Gray, and riots, the department asked the DOJ to investigate and recommend changes. That investigation turned up widespread abuses and unconstitutional behavior by officers, and the DOJ and department reached an agreement to make several changes. Among the changes were things like enhanced training in de-escalation techniques, training in community policing tactics and changes to rules about when and how officers could engage with citizens and suspects.

Let me stress again: These agreements were reached AFTER an investigation found and documented hundreds of instances of abuse. Including the wrongful death of suspects, the beating of innocent citizens, allegations of theft and multiple violations of constitutional rights of citizens.

But that didn’t matter to Sessions.

What did matter was that the majority of the victims were minorities.

No matter the situation, no matter the injustice, if it happens to a person of color, Sessions is incapable of empathy or of simply doing the right thing. And this is not new for him.

He acted similarly when he was Alabama’s AG. He did and said racist things while a federal prosecutor in Alabama. He was no better as this state’s senator. And he’s been an embarrassment as AG.

But some people now want to give him a pass because he did one right thing and recused from the Russia investigation.

That’s what he was supposed to do. He was the AG. He was supposed to follow the law.

Sessions doesn’t get rewarded for doing the absolute bare minimum. He doesn’t get to be recast as a hero because he wasn’t awful this one time.

And if you’re inclined to think otherwise, remember the story of Laquan McDonald.

Four years ago, police in Chicago shot and killed McDonald. At the time of the shooting, he was walking away from the cops. They shot him 16 times.

The official story from police, however, was that McDonald had “lunged” at them and they feared for their lives. They told the public he was shot once.

At least 20 cops in the department knew the story was a lie. Multiple cops in the department, including senior and high-ranking officers, signed off on it, repeated it and turned a blind eye.

The department turned away witnesses, tried to destroy video evidence, and lied repeatedly about the incident.

The cop who shot McDonald had a history of abuse dating back years. Abuses that had done little to stop his upward climb in the department.

The subsequent DOJ investigation found widespread abuses within the Chicago PD. It found multiple instances of officers violating the constitutional rights of citizens, sometimes through physical assaults, and facing little or no discipline for their actions. And it found a climate that would support an entire department lying to cover up a murder.

Jeff Sessions knew of these findings. And of ones in other departments. And still, on his way out the door, his last act was to pull the thin rug from under the feet of citizens abused and murdered by the police.

That’s who Jeff Sessions is.

Don’t let anyone tell you otherwise.

 

Continue Reading

Featured Columnists

Opinion | Got to get rid of this Democratic Party of Alabama

Joey Kennedy

Published

on

The problem is the Democratic Party of Alabama. An awful mess looks better.

In Tuesday’s elections, Republicans won top to bottom in statewide and congressional races  that had credible Democratic Party challengers.

And across those races, the Democrats were clearly, unquestionably, more qualified than their stale, same-as-always, mostly race-baiting, health care-hating, fear-mongering Republican incumbents.

Gov.-elect Kay Ivey clearly ran the better campaign. Democrat and Tuscaloosa Mayor Walt Maddox had a plan for just about everything. He campaigned non-stop, answered every question, laid out his ideas, and lost in a landslide.

Ivey stayed quiet, refused to debate, promised nothing new, laid out no plans, and won in a rout.

Advertisement

It was pretty much the same across the board. Republicans offered nothing new; Democrats offered a lot new; Republicans refused to debate; Democrats answered questions. Republicans ignored their voters; Democrats engaged them.

Republicans, across the board, won easily. It wasn’t even close, in even the closest race.

But here’s the big difference: The Republican Party of Alabama has its stuff together. It knows how to run campaigns, knows how to win and what will win, and follows through.

The Democratic Party of Alabama does absolutely nothing. It’s a meaningless little club, for meaningless little people who think they can wield power, but only in their tiny, grotesque imaginations.

So all those Democrats who were shellacked on Tuesday stood alone without statewide Democratic Party support. Republican candidates had the winning infrastructure; Democratic candidates had losers running the state party – the same losers who have been running the state party for way too long now.

Credit those candidates — Walt Maddox, Will Boyd, Judge Robert Vance, Joe Siegelman, Heather Milam, those running for Congress and other offices – for doing a helluva lot –basically on their own — with their own campaign organizations, grassroots canvassing teams, fundraising, and get-out-the-vote efforts.

Many, many progressives (and Republicans) came out, too. It took me a half hour to vote Tuesday morning, most of that time spent in line. The only other time I’ve seen that much enthusiasm for an election was in 2008, when Barack Obama won his first term.

Still, it wasn’t enough. Because the state Democratic Party sat this one out. It couldn’t do otherwise, because it’s absolutely dysfunctional, in disarray, more than an awful mess, led by ancients or lackeys, and it’ll be the same in two years if something isn’t done.

The time is now to jettison Joe Reed and his cronies if Democrats ever want to do more than win the 7th Congressional District or the once-in-a-lifetime special election for the U.S. Senate against a child predator who, not surprisingly, was the Republican.

The results from Tuesday night did surprise me. Not that Republicans won every statewide race and the congressional seats. That I did expect.

But that the margins were so wide is discouraging. The difference, friends, is that the Republicans have solid party organization behind them. Even though Republicans elected to public office have been regularly removed from many of those same offices for corruption over the past few years. Even though Republicans sponsor programs that are terrible for most Alabamians. Even though they are peopled by many who are racist or homophobic or misogynous or xenophobic, or all of the above.

Even though they take Alabama voters so for granted that they don’t even have to campaign, or answer questions, or do much more than cut a few ribbons for new businesses or attend Republican-sponsored events where the crowds are peopled by folks just themselves.

Maddox, Vance, Siegelman, et al., did amazingly well, considering what they were up against.

Nationally, Democrats did well, winning back the U.S. House and some governorships and state legislatures here and there.

The 2018 Democratic Party of Alabama, however, did exactly what it’s done for the past decade or so: Nothing.

Nothing to write home about. Nothing to help Alabama move forward. And certainly nothing to vote for.

Somebody needs to get rid of it.

Joey Kennedy, a Pulitzer Prize winner, writes a column every week for Alabama Political Reporter. Email: [email protected]

 

Continue Reading

Authors

Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement

Trending

Opinion | The worst candidate in Alabama

by Josh Moon Read Time: 4 min
0