Statewide totalsWinner reported by civicAPI
- Young Boozer, IIIInc.civicAPI winnerRepublican946,936 votes83.7%
- Scott HammondLibertarian175,034 votes15.5%
- Write-inNonpartisan8,855 votes0.8%
All Alabama results
State Treasurer
November 8, 2022. Archived results from the Alabama Secretary of State’s office, via civicAPI. Coverage may be incomplete.
Archived results
CheckedOverall results
County results
- Young Boozer, III leads
Hover over or select a county for its results.
| Autauga | 87.3%13,487 | 12.2%1,884 | 0.5%70 | R+75.1 | 100% estimated reporting |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baldwin | 88.0%59,024 | 11.7%7,842 | 0.3%224 | R+76.3 | 100% estimated reporting |
| Barbour | 86.0%3,851 | 13.5%603 | 0.6%25 | R+72.5 | 100% estimated reporting |
| Bibb | 90.3%4,721 | 9.1%473 | 0.6%31 | R+81.3 | 100% estimated reporting |
| Blount | 93.2%14,941 | 6.8%1,083 | 0.1%15 | R+86.4 | 100% estimated reporting |
| Bullock | 72.6%810 | 26.0%290 | 1.4%16 | R+46.6 | 100% estimated reporting |
| Butler | 87.8%3,819 | 11.6%506 | 0.6%24 | R+76.2 | 100% estimated reporting |
| Calhoun | 86.1%22,156 | 13.1%3,382 | 0.8%193 | R+73.0 | 100% estimated reporting |
| Chambers | 84.8%5,887 | 14.2%984 | 1.0%72 | R+70.6 | 100% estimated reporting |
| Cherokee | 93.8%6,890 | 6.0%441 | 0.2%14 | R+87.8 | 100% estimated reporting |
| Chilton | 92.8%10,472 | 7.1%798 | 0.2%19 | R+85.7 | 100% estimated reporting |
| Choctaw | 82.3%3,095 | 17.2%647 | 0.5%17 | R+65.1 | 100% estimated reporting |
| Clarke | 89.7%5,305 | 9.9%587 | 0.4%23 | R+79.8 | 100% estimated reporting |
| Clay | 92.7%3,586 | 7.2%278 | 0.1%5 | R+85.5 | 100% estimated reporting |
| Cleburne | 94.5%4,152 | 5.4%239 | 0.1%5 | R+89.0 | 100% estimated reporting |
| Coffee | 90.1%11,199 | 9.6%1,188 | 0.4%46 | R+80.5 | 100% estimated reporting |
| Colbert | 87.4%12,637 | 12.3%1,772 | 0.4%55 | R+75.1 | 100% estimated reporting |
| Conecuh | 87.1%2,543 | 12.5%364 | 0.4%12 | R+74.7 | 100% estimated reporting |
| Coosa | 86.9%2,655 | 12.5%381 | 0.6%19 | R+74.4 | 100% estimated reporting |
| Covington | 93.7%9,690 | 6.1%635 | 0.1%16 | R+87.6 | 100% estimated reporting |
| Crenshaw | 92.1%3,563 | 7.6%294 | 0.3%11 | R+84.5 | 100% estimated reporting |
| Cullman | 93.3%23,291 | 6.6%1,646 | 0.2%39 | R+86.7 | 100% estimated reporting |
| Dale | 88.5%9,382 | 10.9%1,156 | 0.6%62 | R+77.6 | 100% estimated reporting |
| Dallas | 72.5%4,066 | 25.5%1,431 | 1.9%109 | R+47.0 | 100% estimated reporting |
| DeKalb | 93.7%14,999 | 6.1%975 | 0.2%28 | R+87.6 | 100% estimated reporting |
| Elmore | 89.0%20,394 | 10.6%2,435 | 0.4%93 | R+78.3 | 100% estimated reporting |
| Escambia | 90.0%7,228 | 9.6%774 | 0.4%33 | R+80.3 | 100% estimated reporting |
| Etowah | 90.1%20,513 | 9.4%2,139 | 0.5%110 | R+80.7 | 100% estimated reporting |
| Fayette | 93.9%4,709 | 5.9%297 | 0.2%8 | R+88.0 | 100% estimated reporting |
| Franklin | 92.6%6,387 | 7.4%508 | 0.1%4 | R+85.2 | 100% estimated reporting |
| Geneva | 93.6%6,981 | 6.2%464 | 0.1%11 | R+87.4 | 100% estimated reporting |
| Greene | 71.0%631 | 27.7%246 | 1.4%12 | R+43.3 | 100% estimated reporting |
| Hale | 80.8%2,289 | 18.5%524 | 0.7%21 | R+62.3 | 100% estimated reporting |
| Henry | 88.2%4,985 | 11.4%645 | 0.4%25 | R+76.7 | 100% estimated reporting |
| Houston | 87.1%21,100 | 12.2%2,959 | 0.7%166 | R+74.9 | 100% estimated reporting |
| Jackson | 92.5%11,408 | 7.2%893 | 0.3%33 | R+85.3 | 100% estimated reporting |
| Jefferson | 73.6%95,370 | 24.7%32,019 | 1.7%2,189 | R+48.9 | 100% estimated reporting |
| Lamar | 94.9%3,847 | 5.0%204 | 0.1%4 | R+89.8 | 100% estimated reporting |
| Lauderdale | 87.3%19,718 | 12.1%2,728 | 0.6%133 | R+75.3 | 100% estimated reporting |
| Lawrence | 88.3%8,255 | 11.4%1,069 | 0.3%24 | R+76.9 | 100% estimated reporting |
| Lee | 82.5%27,291 | 16.6%5,488 | 0.9%296 | R+65.9 | 100% estimated reporting |
| Limestone | 83.7%23,035 | 15.7%4,314 | 0.6%169 | R+68.0 | 100% estimated reporting |
| Lowndes | 73.6%1,349 | 25.1%460 | 1.3%24 | R+48.5 | 100% estimated reporting |
| Macon | 53.5%1,329 | 43.3%1,075 | 3.2%79 | R+10.2 | 100% estimated reporting |
| Madison | 74.1%70,883 | 24.7%23,651 | 1.2%1,177 | R+49.4 | 100% estimated reporting |
| Marengo | 83.3%3,817 | 16.1%738 | 0.6%25 | R+67.2 | 100% estimated reporting |
| Marion | 94.6%7,594 | 5.3%423 | 0.1%9 | R+89.4 | 100% estimated reporting |
| Marshall | 92.0%21,007 | 7.9%1,798 | 0.2%40 | R+84.1 | 100% estimated reporting |
| Mobile | 78.5%64,227 | 20.3%16,640 | 1.1%929 | R+58.2 | 100% estimated reporting |
| Monroe | 86.8%4,263 | 12.6%619 | 0.6%28 | R+74.2 | 100% estimated reporting |
| Montgomery | 68.4%24,943 | 29.8%10,862 | 1.8%639 | R+38.6 | 100% estimated reporting |
| Morgan | 88.0%25,042 | 11.6%3,301 | 0.4%110 | R+76.4 | 100% estimated reporting |
| Perry | 71.0%904 | 27.9%355 | 1.2%15 | R+43.1 | 100% estimated reporting |
| Pickens | 84.7%4,201 | 14.9%739 | 0.4%22 | R+69.8 | 100% estimated reporting |
| Pike | 86.5%5,404 | 12.7%795 | 0.7%45 | R+73.8 | 100% estimated reporting |
| Randolph | 93.3%5,419 | 6.5%376 | 0.2%10 | R+86.9 | 100% estimated reporting |
| Russell | 75.0%6,005 | 23.8%1,908 | 1.2%99 | R+51.1 | 100% estimated reporting |
| Shelby | 84.1%51,630 | 15.3%9,392 | 0.6%374 | R+68.8 | 100% estimated reporting |
| St. Clair | 90.5%23,123 | 9.3%2,367 | 0.3%69 | R+81.2 | 100% estimated reporting |
| Sumter | 78.8%1,155 | 20.5%300 | 0.8%11 | R+58.3 | 100% estimated reporting |
| Talladega | 86.9%14,385 | 12.4%2,058 | 0.7%111 | R+74.5 | 100% estimated reporting |
| Tallapoosa | 91.7%10,419 | 7.8%892 | 0.4%46 | R+83.9 | 100% estimated reporting |
| Tuscaloosa | 82.5%32,251 | 16.3%6,371 | 1.2%454 | R+66.2 | 100% estimated reporting |
| Walker | 91.8%15,124 | 8.1%1,326 | 0.2%28 | R+83.7 | 100% estimated reporting |
| Washington | 91.9%4,437 | 7.8%379 | 0.3%13 | R+84.0 | 100% estimated reporting |
| Wilcox | 83.9%1,360 | 15.4%249 | 0.7%12 | R+68.5 | 100% estimated reporting |
| Winston | 94.3%6,303 | 5.6%375 | 0.1%5 | R+88.7 | 100% estimated reporting |
About these results
Historical coverage may omit races, candidates or counties. Summaries show up to three candidates. Full race pages include all available candidates and county results. Reporting percentages are civicAPI estimates. Winner marks reflect civicAPI’s calls, not certification. Delayed updates retain the last available results.
Lead is the first-place candidate's advantage over second place, in percentage points. Shift compares the Republican-minus-Democratic margin with the same seat's most recent general election in civicAPI's archive. It can swing widely while votes are counted, and district lines may have changed between elections. Seat counts include only races civicAPI has called; leads are not calls.