Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?


Representatives Love and McClurkin Introduce Bill to Save PACT Settlement

By Brandon Moseley
Alabama Political Reporter

Alabama House of Representatives Members Jay Love (R) from Montgomery and Mary Sue McClurkin (R) from Indian Springs have introduced a House Bill that would attempt to change Alabama law so that the PACT class action settlement can by reinstated.  The Alabama Supreme Court has recently overturned the settlement of the class action lawsuit brought by PACT owners because of wording in the original statute that prevents benefit changes.

“It simply strikes the language they used as a reason to overturn the settlement,” said Representative Love to the press.

Rep. Jay Love said on Facebook, “I am working with Sen. Tripp Pittman, the Treasurer, The Governor’s office, the AG’s office and the House and Senate leadership on this issue. The bill as introduced strikes the language from the 2010 act that the Supreme Court based their decision to throw out the settlement. All the above parties agreed that moving this bill as quickly as possible while the Treasurer’s office was asking for the Court to reconsider their opinion was the most prudent. We have had very little time to communicate with anyone what the best course to take would be and only decided Tuesday afternoon that this was the best way to address it.”

The Alabama Supreme Court’s overturning of the PACT settlement means that the PACT fund could run out of money in as soon as three years.

Alabama State Treasurer Young Boozer III said, ““We are disappointed in the Court’s ruling but we have respect for the Court and the judicial process,” said State Treasurer and PACT Board Chair Young Boozer. “It appears the Court’s decision was based on the belief that certain language in Act 2010-725 conclusively prohibits any type of compromise between the PACT Program and its participants. We do not believe the Legislature would have intended the language of Act 2010-725 to require such a result, especially under the circumstances now facing the program.”

“We negotiated in good faith an agreement that would have provided benefits to all PACT beneficiaries. Today’s ruling reinforces our determination to reach a solution that does just that. We remain confident that the settlement is in the best interests of all program participants, and we intend to ask the Court to reconsider granting approval to the settlement,” Treasurer Boozer concluded.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

The PACT (Prepaid Affordable College Tuition) Program was a Section 529 pre-paid college tuition program run by the Alabama Treasurer’s office. “Section 529 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 authorizes states to create two types of college savings programs, prepaid tuition plans and college savings plans. As college costs climbed faster than the global economy was growing in the 2000s the PACT board invested the funds in riskier and riskier investments.  When the Great Recession hit in 2008 a large portion of the principal was lost in those risky investments.

Critics of the PACT Program argue that the Program is just another risky investment vehicle like mutual funds, hedge funds, or wealth management accounts and that the parents were simply speculating in the equities market like so many other investors and that they should have known that there was a possibility that they might have losses.

Parents who bought into the PACT program disagree.  As one parent recently wrote for the website, LeftinAlabama: “We purchased a prepaid contract for services marketed by the State of Alabama – kind of like buying a prepaid funeral or prepaying for any other service.  It’s a contract, not an investment.”

Alabama and Auburn Universities argue that they did not get the money, they did not lose the money, and they have refused to allow the children of PACT participants to get in to college at the tuition rates when the parents prepaid for the tution.

The state informed the parents that they might not be able to honor the contracts.  The parents then filed a class action lawsuit arguing that they had purchased “Prepaid Affordable College Tuition” as the PACT program is titled and were not investors in some sort of failed mutual fund.  The state settled with the PACT parents out of court; but that agreement was thrown out by the court bringing this issue up again.  It is estimated that it could cost Alabama taxpayers as much as $864 million to make the PACT fund whole.

The PACT website says: “PACT remains closed to enrollment.”

Brandon Moseley is a former reporter at the Alabama Political Reporter.

More from APR


Recently, some citizens have publicly criticized the mayor for his actions regarding the Ozark-Dale County Public Library Board and his social media interactions with...


One officer was terminated for excessive force by Sheriff Joe Hamilton, but two others remain employed.


An ADOC guard is being accused of encouraging incarcerated people to murder another incarcerated person.


This funding is aimed at launching a biotech initiative to not only attract but also bolster existing startups in Alabama.