Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?


Election Day 2012…Making A Hard Choice


By Vernon Burns
Alabama Political Reporter

While the people of Alabama will, without hesitation, reject the government centered future again offered to us by Obama and the democrats on November 6th, an easy choice. However, I must speak about a hard choice.

Amendment One: The extension of The Forever Wild Land Trust. This is a decision I wish I did not have to face. If our state and our nation were on a sound financial foundation, as I and most Alabama folks assumed in 1992, when we overwhelmingly approved the creation of Forever Wild, then yes is the only vote I could make.

The irony for me is I truly appreciate the value of this program to future generations and wish to see it continued. Over the past year, I have worked to promote the extension of Forever Wild at every turn. I have helped in organizing meetings and spoken out at every opportunity to dispute all the misrepresentations made about, what I consider one of the very few well thought out and well run government programs. If all of state government and our national government were operated any where near as efficiently as our Forever wild land trust then I would not be writing this.

But what I wish were true and the real world of 2012 are completely opposite. The wake up call, relating this to Forever wild, came when the governor and the legislature engineered the confiscation of 437 million dollars from the Alabama Trust Fund. These monies were taken with no plan or guarantee in the law to repay, and will be used to prop up the ever expansing medicaid (welfare) and prison populations.

The pledge, made to future generations by the people of Alabama in 1982 to hold the income we receive from oil and gas royalties in a permeant trust has now been violated. It is true games have been played with the trust before but, as of now, it is broken. How can we relate this to Forever Wild? The Alabama Trust Fund and the Forever Wild Land Trust, in my view, are two remarkable programs tied together in both concept and practice.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

The Alabama Trust Fund was created, by the people of our state, to be a permeant and growing investment to hold the oil and gas royalties generated by the development of our natural resources on our public lands. With the royalty income as the principal and only the interest income generated by the trust investments being used to fund the legitimate functions of state government, we had established a conservative, common sense, method of preserving the benefits of our natural resources for future generations.

In 1992 this preservation of public natural resources was taken one logical step further. The Forever Wild Land Trust was created, with an 84% yes vote, to use 10% or less of the interest from the Alabama Trust Fund to purchase another natural resource, open public land for the permeant benefit of all citizens.

This is a very short over view of the why and how both The Alabama Trust Fund and The Forever wild Land Trust came to be. I see both as examples of the “wise and frugal government” Thomas Jefferson called for in his first inaugural address March 4, 1801.

Now both programs are being consumed by the monster our human weakness has created. The welfare state, with its endless promise of entitlements, and the crushing debt that is used to feed that beast, is destroying all we hold dear.

When our elected representatives break into to Alabama Trust Fund, to feed the welfare state, and get past their next election, I am not shocked. When that 437 million dollars has been burned in the entitlement fire, I can see the trust fund being robbed again.

As a conservative I firmly believe the preservation of our natural resources, along with their wise use, is the duty of each generation. I also know, without a doubt in my mind, the preservation and wise use of those resources can only be accomplished when it is based in a sound economic frame work. When the politicians managed this violation of The Alabama Trust Fund they apparently gave little or no consideration to Forever Wild. Modern political theory must teach that you can have your cake and eat it too.

I can not agree. The economic survival of our state and nation must override the yes vote my heart wants to make on amendment one. I vote “No” with the promise that I will do all I can to help restore Forever Wild when the underlying funding source is restored.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

I vote “No” knowing that if we do not restore our state and our nation to the principals that have always made us the strongest force for good in this world, we will lose Forever Wild, and all else we hold dear, forever.

Written By