Connect with us

Guest Columnists

Issues arise in House Committee over Gulf Park project

Beth Clayton



By Beth Clayton

MONTGOMERY–The debate over plans for Gulf State Park continued in the House Economic Development and Tourism committee Thursday afternoon. The bill, sponsored by Senator Trip Pittman (R- Daphne), would allow a 29 acre tract of land in Gulf State Park to be leased out to develop a lodge and conference center.

“We’re losing convention business because we just do not have the facilities to accommodate conventions,” said Representative Steve McMillan (R-Bay Minette), who introduced the bill to the house committee.

“It will be a facility the people of Alabama will be proud of,” said David Perry, Governor Bentley’s chief of staff.

Throughout the debate, the same issues continued to arise regarding this bill. During the public hearing, Representative Joe Hubbard (D-Montgomery) questioned the word choice and expedited rate that many legislators wanted to pass the bill. Following the committee hearing, it became clear that the amendments had been dropped, raising concerns about gambling on the property.  Despite the concerns, the bill will go to the House floor next week.

Lack of a gambling amendment
When the bill was in the senate committee, they attached three amendments to the bill, most notably an amendment to prohibit gambling from taking place on this property at this or any future point.

Right now, gambling is illegal in Alabama except on Indian land, which is federally protected. The amendment would have prohibited gambling on the park property, even in the event that gambling becomes legal during the duration of the lease.

Public Service Announcement

When the bill arrived in the Senate, Pittman stripped the amendments from the bill in an effort to expedite the process of passing the legislation.

Pittman explained that multiple amendments were causing the debate to last too long, which threatened the chance of getting the legislation passed through the House and signed before the end of the session.

“Every time this bill has ever come up, we’ve always been able to put that [gambling prohibition] in there…Now that its about to pass, it’s not in there,” said John Rice, a lobbyist against the bill.


“This is huge,” Rice said. “If you were ever going to build a casino in Alabama, where would you put it?”

Pittman says that he would support a supplemental bill or amendment next year to add in gambling prohibition to the bill. “I was the one who added the amendment…I am concerned about it.”

Pittman encourages the House to go ahead and pass the legislation, rather than adding an amendment and sending it back to the Senate.

Why rush the bill?
This leads to the next concern- Why is it so important to go ahead and pass the legislation, even while it admittedly has holes?

“This is something that has been worked on for a long time,” Pittman said.

The project is planned to be funded by money from the National Resource Damage Assessment (NRDA) from the BP oil spill. “We’re optimistic BP will be paying within the next months or the next year,” Pittman said.

When projects in the past have been stopped because of lawsuits or other issues, the money set aside for those projects is lost, Pittman said. “If we don’t have this bill there in order to move forward with the project when the money comes, there’s a real likelihood the money will be gone, and we will lose the opportunity,” he said.

Hubbard was not satisfied with this answer. He became frustrated in the committee meeting because the legislation was being pushed through so quickly, even with a typographical error and a concern over word usage.

Hubbard reminded the committee that they were sent to Montgomery to enact the best legislation possible, and he felt it was irresponsible to move forward without the best bill possible.

“Whatever we do, by goodness it should be right when we pass it…to the best of our ability to do so,” Hubbard said.

Requests for Proposals
Lastly, we come to the word that caused all of the trouble for the committee: “may.”

In section 4, subsection a, the bill reads, “The governor may issue requests for proposals, in part or in whole, for the construction, development, improvement, lease, and beneficial use of a project to persons whom the Governor shall have determined are qualified.”

Many opponents of the legislation would like to see the word ‘may’ changed to the word ‘shall,’ which would force the Governor to issue a request for proposals (RFP), should they decide to move forward with the project.

McMillan contended that the word ‘may’ was used to indicate that the Governor may or may not proceed with the project, depending on the results of a current market feasibility study.

“We don’t know if or when money will come in from NRDA or other sources,” Perry said. “But we intend to move forward with the market feasibility study so we can be prepared to move forward if it makes sense and when the money hits,” he said.

The current market feasibility study should be complete by late summer or early fall, Perry said.

Hubbard, along with John Teague, a lobbyist opposing the bill, said that the word ‘may’ would allow the government to be in the position to select the firms to contract to do the work. By using the word ‘shall,’ it requires the Governor to issue RFPs if he chooses to move forward, they said.

“If you don’t want to put out an RFP, you don’t have to. That’s just common sense. If you have no reason to put out an RFP, you don’t have to,” Teague said.

If the line were to be changed to ‘shall,’ it still wouldn’t compel the Governor to put out an RFP, unless he decided to move forward, at which point he would “bid it off,” Teague explained.

The way Teague interprets the bill, the word ‘may’ allows the Governor the ability to “anoint the contractor, the plans, whatever,” he said.

Hubbard proposed an amendment to change ‘may’ to ‘shall,’ which was seconded by Representative Napoleon Bracy (D-Prichard), but the amendment failed to pass in committee.

Next steps forward
The bill as written will move to the House for a vote next week.


Guest Columnists

Opinion | There’s still work to be done

Chris Elliott



Last weekend should have been a shining moment for the state of Alabama, a celebration of the life and efforts of Congressman John Lewis — a true freedom fighter and hero for civil rights and equality in our nation.

It was also an opportunity to reflect on our past and be proud of how far we Alabamians have come. Republicans and Democrats, blacks and whites — all came together to honor and remember the life of Alabama’s courageous and remarkable son.

Well, not all, apparently.

What possible reason could a public official have to attend a 199th birthday party for the founder of the Ku Klux Klan while you’re in the same city as the funeral procession of a venerated civil rights hero who was literally beaten by that same Klan?

It almost seems absurd that we should have to have these conversations here in 2020, but here we are.

It is especially disconcerting to see behavior like this coming from someone so young. Perhaps one could expect this sort of thing from a grandparent or great-grandparent, as they were products of an era that may still hold those problematic, antiquated views — but from a 30-year-old, someone who should exemplify how far we have come as a state? It is worrying, to say the least.

To lack the basic knowledge of history to know that the 199-year-old birthday boy at your party was the founder of the KKK seems incongruent with the career of this young House member, who continues to claim to be a student of Confederate history. Perhaps it’s willful ignorance — it’s tough to tell.

Public Service Announcement

For all the progress our state has made in moving forward from our history of racial divisiveness and strife, incidents like the one involving this young State representative are an important lesson that while it is important for us to remember our past, our priority must be our continued journey to the better, brighter future that awaits us all and that, thanks to Will Dismukes, that journey is clearly not over yet.

Rep. Dismukes has, however, shone a bright light for those of us that thought racism was something we could put behind us. In the words of Congressman John Lewis from our own Edmund Pettus Bridge, “We must use this moment to recommit ourselves to do all we can to finish the work. There’s still work left to be done.”

Continue Reading

Guest Columnists

Opinion | Dr. Wayne Reynolds should resign from the State Board of Education

Glenn Henry



Dear Dr. Wayne Reynolds, Thank you so very much for apologizing to our awesome Gov. Kay Ivey for your comments made recently. First, let’s talk honestly about the little girl with freckles from Camden, Alabama, who grew up to be our nation’s best governor.

In Alabama, the most trusted and powerful elected officials are Sen. Richard Shelby and Gov. Kay Ivey. The reasons are due to their core values, such as honesty, integrity, trust, accountability, responsibility, and prudent decision-making.

Dr. Reynolds, when I first read your comments concerning Gov. Kay Ivey, I was very upset. Although I’m a 63-year old African-American Republican, those comments hurt me, because I have worked with Gov. Ivey for years to solve problems. I was worried that she may be hurt.

Just for your information, due to the poorly performing state school superintendent, Alabama State Department of Education and State Board of Education, there is a lack of trust from the public.

Gov. Ivey has earned trust from the nation — from the president of the United States, vice president, secretary of defense, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, secretary of the Air Force and the chief of staff of the Air Force. Truthfully, she is the only person who can get things done. I personally know.

I have binders and documents stacked 6 feet high, concerning numerous issues and solutions Gov. Ivey has provided. Although I send emails to the state superintendent, State Department of Education and the State Board of Education. I can recall no solutions coming from any of these entities. Basically, all I see are people following parliamentary protocols, and raising their hands — but never solving any problems, including no solutions from Dr. Reynolds.

Due to these poor perceptions, many people are wondering if these entities are needed. In my view, since Gov. Ivey seems to be the only one solving all of the problems, and she is out-thinking all of us, why do we need a state school superintendent, State Department of Education or State Board of Education?

Public Service Announcement

Dr. Reynolds, sir, we can’t be observing women’s bodies — looking at their rear ends and commenting on their weight. You claimed you were just making an observation. Sir, we have a mission to accomplish, and we have too much work to do. Education must be fixed.  The state of Alabama is dead last in math, and we are at the bottom of all national lists.

Dr. Reynolds, sir, please spend more of your time providing solutions to the numerous problems facing our great state. If you can’t provide solutions, you should respectfully resign instead of discussing foolishness.

I was raised to compliment and help our leaders, especially our female leaders, by placing them on a pedestal and helping them to be successful.


Gov. Ivey has earned the respect from the highest levels of the federal government. She is one of our trusted wingmen, because she has been doing the jobs of the state superintendent, State Department of Education and the State School Board. She doesn’t have time to waste on craziness.

Respectfully, Dr. Reynolds, if you and the other board members resign, you can be easily replaced. We are in last place anyway. The lack of trust, and foolish comments by Dr. Reynolds, surely do not help the State Board of Education, which continues to be ineffective. No one is following you.  Folks are running away from you.

Haven’t you recognized this yet? Gov. Ivey is basically doing your job anyway.

Continue Reading

Guest Columnists

Opinion | Alabama’s finest hour

Progress for unity comes in fits and starts, Sunday in Alabama was a giant leap forward and a day that helps define our future.

Will Sellers



The casket of former congressman John Lewis as he lays in state at the Capitol Sunday, July 26, 2020 in Montgomery, Ala. (Governor's Office/Hal Yeager)

In describing his constituents, George Wallace used to say that “the people of Alabama are just as cultured, refined and gracious as anyone else in America.” Whether it was true when he said it or not, it made Alabamians stand a little higher and feel better about their circumstances.

If actions speak louder than words, on Sunday, the people Alabama in memorializing John Lewis demonstrated to the nation how truly refined, gracious and cultured we really are. While other parts of the nation were literally on fire and factions seethed with hate, Alabamians provided a stark contrast in honoring Congressman Lewis.

Where 55 years ago State Troopers severely beat John Lewis, on Sunday fully integrated law enforcement officers saluted him and gave him the dignity and respect he earned and deserved. Where once the governor of Alabama prevented Civil Rights marchers from entering the Capitol, on Sunday, Alabama Gov. Kay Ivey, silently stood near Jefferson Davis’s star and with respect and solemnity saluted and welcomed the casket of the 80-year-old congressman.

In other parts of America, where Democrats and Republicans engage in angry debates neither giving nor receiving quarter, in Montgomery, on Sunday, members of both parties came together, transcended partisanship and found common ground in recognizing someone who lived a faithful life in support of peace, justice and mutual understanding.

Indeed, in some cities in our country federal law enforcement officials, without invitation or consent from mayors or governors, were engaged in riot control. At the Capitol in Montgomery, federal officials were not only invited but attended and participated in a memorial service. Federal troops came, not with a show of force, but as an honor guard to drape the mortal remains with an American flag as a pall to lie in state. While Federal marshals were present, they were there to pay their respects and mourn Lewis, not to protect federal property from destruction.

On Sunday, Alabama taught the world what racial harmony looks like; Alabama showed an integrated community embracing a hopeful future. Any outsider saw clearly that Alabama is no longer tied to a past anchored in division, but is a mosaic of people from all walks of life coming together, laying aside their differences and agreeing that when a great man dies, the brightness of his sun setting reveals a glorious legacy for all to pause, reflect and regard in all its majesty.

Sunday was a testament to dreams anticipated and while not yet fulfilled, much closer to reality. The celebration of Lewis in his native Alabama served to acknowledge the legacy of the civil rights movement that still motivates us to judge people not on their externals, but on the internals of kindness reflected in the content of each one’s character.

Public Service Announcement

Progress for unity comes in fits and starts, Sunday in Alabama was a giant leap forward and a day that helps define our future.

Continue Reading

Guest Columnists

Opinion | Prison system issues show “lack of institutional control”

“Our Department of Corrections is not being run in a manner that the people of Alabama should accept, and it is past time to make a change there.”

Matt Simpson



“Lack of institutional control.”

Growing up as a sports fan in Alabama, and even when I attended the University of Alabama, I became familiar with that phrase as the NCAA brought down sanctions on our beloved athletic programs.

Our athletics programs should hold themselves to higher standards, the champion level programs we’ve come to expect in our state, whether you say “Roll Tide” or “War Eagle.”

Shouldn’t we hold the officials in charge of running and managing Alabama’s prison systems to at least a modicum of the same standards?

When you look at the Department of Justice report released last week detailing the continued horrendous abuses within our state’s prison system, there is no way that you can read the horrors outlined there and not think there’s a lack of institutional control that starts at the very top.

When a prisoner handcuffed to a bed is beaten with a baton while an officer yells “I am the reaper of death, now say my name!”, there is a lack of institutional control.

When an inmate is punched in the face for simply sticking their tongue out, there is a lack of institutional control.

Public Service Announcement

When the officials in charge of our prison system have known about these violations for years and know they are under investigation from the federal government and the abuses still continue to happen, there is a lack of institutional control.

Our prison guards, corrections officers and staff are overworked, underpaid and understaffed, with some of our prisons remaining at half of their full hiring capacity – despite the fact that last year, the Legislature appropriated more than enough money to fill those positions and create new ones to help secure and make safer our correctional institutions. Those positions, both current and new, have not been filled, so our officers and staff at these prisons continue to not get the support they need and deserve due to the inaction of our Alabama Department of Corrections Commissioner.

Not using the ample resources and funding that have been given to you – again, it’s a clear lack of institutional control by the Alabama Department of Corrections’ leadership and something has to change.


We need new leadership who is actually willing to address these problems head-on and make the changes necessary to fix these problems.

We need new leadership who is willing to work with the Legislature and not try to do things behind the scenes of behind closed doors. The entire nation is watching how we handle this, and we need to be as open, as honest and as transparent as we possibly can be.

Our Department of Corrections is not being run in a manner that the people of Alabama should accept, and it is past time to make a change there.

Lack of institutional control – we would not allow and have not tolerated it from a football coach, and we certainly don’t need to continue to tolerate it from appointed government officials who should be working for the people.

Continue Reading