Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

News

Sessions Says Napolitano’s Service Defined by Consistent Disrespect for the Rule of Law

By Brandon Moseley
Alabama Political Reporter

Late last week Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano announced that she was resigning from her position. U.S. Senator Jeff Sessions (R) from Alabama has been a vocal critic of Napolitano’s performance as Secretary of the Homeland Security Department including her interpretation of immigration law and her enforcement of border security provisions. Sen. Sessions took a harsh tone on the announcement that Secretary Napolitano was leaving.

U.S. Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-AL), “Secretary Napolitano’s tenure at the Department of Homeland Security was defined by a consistent disrespect for the rule of law.”

Sen. Sessions continued. “The resignation of Secretary Napolitano should refocus the attention of Congress on its first task: to ensure that the executive branch faithfully carries out the laws of the land. The most significant obstacle to immigration reform remains President Obama’s selective enforcement of the law. Any selection—interim or permanent—to replace Secretary Napolitano must disavow these aggressive non-enforcement directives or there is very little hope for successful immigration reform.”

Sen. Sessions concluded, “Whoever replaces Secretary Napolitano must restore the rule of law, as well as the morale of ICE officers which has plummeted under her tenure.”

Immigration and Customs Enforcement Officers have claimed in a federal lawsuit that Napolitano and her subordinates have interpreted and implemented policies which effectively prevents them from carrying out their duties to hunt down and deport illegal aliens that are in this country. Sen. Sessions has been a staunch supporter of the ICE agents and their union against the bureaucrats in ICE and Homeland Security.

Sen. Session has used Napolitano’s controversial tenure as Secretary of Homeland Security as a reason why immigration reform should not pass. Sessions’ argument is that if the administration refuses to enforce immigration laws that are already on the books, why can we trust them to implement new homeland security measures in a new immigration bill?

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

Sen. Sessions is a senior member of the Senate Judiciary Committee.

Brandon Moseley is a former reporter at the Alabama Political Reporter.

Advertisement
Advertisement

More from APR

Courts

When constitutional qualifications are challenged, courts should ask for proof before voters are asked to choose from potentially ineligible candidates.

Featured Opinion

At 250, America’s promise remains unfinished, demanding truth, courage and fidelity from citizens willing to repair the republic together now.

Courts

South Carolina’s Supreme Court once faced a hard residency question at a hard political moment. It did not hide from the constitution.

This Matters with Bill Britt

Bill Britt examines patriotism, criticism and the American promise that each generation must decide whether to preserve or abandon.