Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?


Luther Strange Asks Supreme Court to Block Obama’s Plan

By Brandon Moseley
Alabama Political Reporter

Tuesday, January 26, Alabama Attorney General Luther Strange (R) announced that Alabama is among a bipartisan coalition of 29 states and state agencies asking the United States Supreme Court to immediately halt President Barack H. Obama’s administration’s CO2 rule for power plants which the states argue is both unlawful and job-killing.  The states argue that the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) Clean Power rule is an unprecedented attempt to reorder the nation’s energy sector and violates federal law.

luther_strangeAttorney General Luther Strange said, “Once again, President Obama has attempted to radically expand the power of the federal government by adopting policies through executive action that Congress has refused to enact.  But the scope of President Obama’s job-killing Clean Power Plan is unprecedented.  If this new EPA rule is allowed to go into effect, it will shutter coal-fired power plants around the country, resulting in higher electricity costs and fewer jobs. The United States Supreme Court should act to immediately stay this rule until the lower courts can address the serious concerns the states have raised about its legality.”

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton said, “The Obama Administration has exceeded its authority in imposing a plan that will kill jobs and significantly raise electric bills for all Americans.  This power grab will force a massive reordering of nearly every state’s electric grid and result in less-reliable service for all customers. Such far-reaching actions raise serious concerns about the power of the federal government.”

The states won a major case in June when the Court blocked EPA’s mercury emissions rules.  Undeterred by the defeat, the Obama released new rules on ozone and CO2 rules which effectively did the same thing.

The bipartisan coalition of states challenged the EPA’s power plan on October 23, 2015, the  day it was published. Those urging  the U.S. Supreme Court to immediately halt the EPA’s unlawful power plan include: Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, New Jersey, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, West Virginia, Wisconsin and Wyoming, along with the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality, Mississippi Public Service Commission, North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality and Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality.

The states in their filing point to the Court’s decision last term in  Michigan v. EPA: “The day after this Court ruled in Michigan  that  EPA  had  violated  the  Clean  Air  Act  (CAA)  in  enacting  its  rule regulating  fossil  fuel-fired  power  plants  under  Section  112  of  the  CAA,  42  U.S.C.§ 7412, EPA boasted  in an official blog post  that the Court’s decision  was  effectively a nullity.  Because the rule had not been stayed during the years of litigation, EPA assured its supporters that “the majority of power plants are already in compliance or well on their way to compliance. Then, in reliance on EPA’s representation that most power plants had already fully complied,  the  DC  Circuit  responded  to  this Court’s  remand  by  declining  to  vacate  the  rule  that  this  Court  had  declared unlawful….In short, EPA extracted  nearly $10 billion a year in compliance from power plants before this Court could even review the rule, Michigan, 135 S. Ct. at  2706, and then successfully used  that  unlawfully-mandated  compliance to keep the  rule  in  place  even  after  this  Court  declared  that  the  agency  had  violated  the law.  In the present case, EPA is seeking to similarly circumvent judicial review, but on an even larger scale and this time directly targeting the states.”

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

The states claim that the Plan is, “The most far reaching and burdensome rule EPA has ever forced onto the States. Relying on five words in a rarely-used provision of the CAA—“best system of emission reduction”—EPA  claims the authority  to require  States  to achieve massive  carbon  dioxide  emission reductions that EPA has calculated based on “shifting” electric  generation away from fossil fuel-fired power plants to other sources of energy—such as wind and solar—that  EPA  prefers.”

The states claim that, “If this Court does not enter a stay, the Plan will continue to unlawfully impose massive and irreparable harms upon the sovereign states, as well as irreversible changes in the energy markets.  In the proceedings before the DC Circuit, the 27 states that sought to stay the Plan and the 18 States that defended it submitted declarations explaining that states are already expending significant time and resources to implement the Power Plan. These federally mandated efforts are forcing states to expend money and resources, displacing the states’ ability to achieve their own sovereign priorities, and requiring some states to change their laws to enable or accommodate a shift from fossil fuel-fired generation to other sources of energy.  And parties on all sides agree that the Plan is currently forcing businesses to shutter plants and make other decisions with long-term and fundamental impacts on energy markets, further compounding the injury to states as market regulators and energy consumers.  Only a stay from this Court now can ensure that EPA will not, in another year or two, once more boast that it has rendered this Court’s review practically meaningless.  Absent a stay, the Power Plan will throughout the lifespan of this litigation—force massive, irreversible changes in terms of state policies and resources, power plant shutdowns, and investments in wind and solar power.”

The new CO2 rules combined with low natural gas prices and already ongoing federal litigation have already led Alabama Power to shut down a number of coal fired power plants in Alabama.  President Obama’s ongoing ‘War on Coal’ has led to the loss of thousands of good paying coal mining jobs as well as transportation sector jobs which were tied to moving coal across the country.

Luther Strange has said that he wakes up every day thinking of new ways to fight the Obama Administration.

Brandon Moseley is a former reporter at the Alabama Political Reporter.

More from APR

Featured Opinion

Meta — the parent company of Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp — will be building an $800 million data center in Alabama’s capitol city.


It’s a win for people who need good jobs, a win for the biotech industry, and a win for our state.

Featured Opinion

Actions speak louder than words. The actions of conservatives have told us that they value stopping abortions more than saving women's lives.


The project is expected to create 130 jobs in Coosa County.