Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

News

Center Stage to give up some bingo games

(STOCK PHOTO)

Center Stage is giving up its electronic bingo operations.

Attorneys for the Houston County Economic Development Association (HEDA), which conducts the charitable bingo operation out of the Dothan-area casino, and Alabama Attorney General Steve Marshall announced on Thursday that they had reached an agreement in the state’s lawsuit.

Marshall’s office sued Center Stage last year over its electronic games and “two-ball” table games, alleging that those games violated the state’s ban on gambling and did not meet the Alabama Supreme Court’s definition of traditional bingo.

HEDA on Thursday agreed to remove those games, but said in a statement that it will continue to offer traditional paper bingo. The statement from HEDA attorneys states that Center Stage does not expect layoffs because of the decision.

This is the second “illegal casino” that has agreed to close following Marshall’s surprise lawsuits against several entities allegedly offering illegal games. A Morgan County casino also closed last year.

But the lawsuits filed by Marshall have yet to take on the big three — casinos operating in Macon County (VictoryLand), Greene County (GreeneTrack) and Lowndes County (Southern Star, White Hall). Those three counties passed bingo amendments after the invention of electronic bingo, and voters in all three counties voted specifically to legalize the electronic machines.

The Alabama Supreme Court rewrote state law in order to make the electronic machines illegal, despite the federal government authorizing their use in Native American casinos. Marshall’s lawsuits would first have to go through county courts, where juries would be unlikely to find against the casinos — the main sources of jobs and county revenue.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

 

Advertisement.

Josh Moon is an investigative reporter and columnist. You can reach him at [email protected].

Advertisement
Advertisement

More from APR

Courts

Justices said a lower court used the wrong law, further delaying a case that has already been postponed eight times.

Courts

Alabama justices heard arguments on whether SB1’s disability-assistance exemption protects people helping voters with absentee ballots from prosecution under the law's payment restrictions.

Elections

Candidates deserve protection from unsupported accusations. Voters deserve confidence that constitutional qualifications have been met.

Elections

The Alabama Supreme Court upheld dismissal without deciding residency, highlighting limits in Alabama’s process for enforcing constitutional qualifications for office.