Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?


Report finds Alabamians give up daily necessities to pay off burdensome court fines, fees


Many Alabamians with court debt are sacrificing basic daily needs like food and medical care to pay down burdensome court costs, fines and fees, a new report has found.

The report — released Wednesday by the Alabama Appleseed Center for Law and Justice, UAB’s Treatment Alternatives for Safer Communities and Legal Services Alabama — found that more than eight in 10 Alabamians with court debt gave up daily necessities to pay down fines, fees, restitution and court costs. And nearly four in 10 resorted to committing crimes in hopes that it would help them pay down their court debt from previous convictions and fines.

The report tracked the experiences of nearly 1,000 Alabamians who are facing court debt for themselves or for other people they care for. The report showed a system that harmed the human rights of low-income people who go through the criminal justice system regardless of their race or background, though the report did find that Alabama’s race-wealth divide, coupled with over-policing of black communities, results in black people who are disproportionately affected by court debt.

“Our courts and prosecutors are supposed to be focused on the fair administration of justice,” said Frank Knaack, executive director of Alabama Appleseed. “Instead, because they are placed in the role of tax assessors and collectors, they are often forced to levy harsh punishments on those unable to pay. As a result, Alabamians who cannot afford their fines and fees must make unconscionable choices – skipping food or medicine or committing crimes to pay down their court debt. Alabama must stop trying to fund the state off the backs of poor people. It is inhumane, makes us less safe, and undermines the integrity of Alabama’s legal system.”

Entitled “Under Pressure: How fines and fees hurt people, undermine public safety, and drive Alabama’s racial wealth divide,” the report blames Alabama’s decision to reject equitable mechanisms for funding the state. Instead, the report’s authors found that Alabama created a system in which courts and prosecutors are revenue collectors.

Each year Alabama’s municipal, district, and circuit courts assess millions of dollars in court costs, fines, fees, and restitution, which the state uses to buoy the General Fund, government agencies, county and municipal funds, and the court system.

Court costs used to fund the state are disproportionately levied against low-income Alabamians, who are more likely to come in contact with police. It’s particularly borne by poor people of color, who are arrested, prosecuted and convicted at higher rates than white people, largely for non-violent drug crimes. While African Americans and white people use marijuana at roughly the same rate, black Alabamians are over four times as likely to be arrested for marijuana possession.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

“The over-policing of African-American communities means African Americans are far more likely than white people to face court debt,” said Scott Douglas, executive director of Greater Birmingham Ministries. “This is made worse by Alabama’s legacy of slavery and Jim Crow, coupled with modern-day structural racism, which has left African-American Alabamians disproportionately impoverished as compared to their white peers. Thus, not only do the racial disparities in the enforcement of Alabama’s criminal laws make African Americans more likely to face court debt, but also Alabama’s racial wealth divide means that African Americans are more likely to face the harsh punishments placed on those who cannot afford to pay.”

People with resources are able to make timely payments for fine-only violations. But those with limited resources are unable to pay fines, resulting in more fine, jail time or debt. Others are forced to use payday lenders in order to pay off court debt, trapping them in a cycle of indebtedness that further contributes to criminal activity.

Those with money can also minimize the consequences of even criminal charges by paying to participate in diversion programs, resulting in either reduced penalties or clean records if successfully completed. People without ready access to cash are often confronted with collections fees, a loss of driver’s licenses, which can hinder the ability to get a job, jail time and life-altering criminal record, according to the report.

“Equal justice under law does not exist when a person’s punishment is determined by their wealth rather than their actions,” said Knaack. “For example, access to diversion programs are often based on nothing more than an individual’s financial well-being. Thus, people who commit the same act face very different punishments because of nothing more than how much money they have. This two-tiered justice system should have no place in Alabama.”

The report was funded in part by the Annie E. Casey Foundation. The foundation’s Southern Partnership to Reduce Debt works to develop strategies to lessen the impact of criminal and civil judicial fines and fees, as well as medical fees, and high-cost consumer products on communities of color.

Alabama Appleseed, a non-partisan organization, works to end poverty and achieve racial equality. It has supported legislation from Republican Sen. Dick Brewbaker in the Alabama Senate that would have reduced penalties for recreational marijuana use and a Democrat-sponsored bill that would have “banned the box,” or prevented the state government from asking about criminal history on job applications.


Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

Chip Brownlee is a former political reporter, online content manager and webmaster at the Alabama Political Reporter. He is now a reporter at The Trace, a non-profit newsroom covering guns in America.

More from APR


The ruling in the case could impact up to 20 state boards that require minority representation by statute.


A net 18 percent of small business owners plan to raise compensation in the next three months.


The state argues that the 11th Circuit reversal of the injunction on the law reinforces the state's right to enforce its law.


The judge also lifted a deadline to produce a document, after previously requiring attorney to hand it over or face potential jailing.