Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?


Death sentence for man who threw his four children off Dauphin Island Bridge death reduced to life

A Vietnamese immigrant who threw his four children off the Dauphin Island Bridge had his death sentenced reduced to life without parole Monday. Lam Luong was convicted by a jury in 2009.

That sentence was appealed by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) who argued that Luong was intellectually impaired thus according to U.S. Supreme Court precedent Atkins versus Virginia could not be executed. The Mobile County court ultimately agreed and the sentence of death was reduced to life in prison without parole in a hearing on Monday.

State School Board member Jackie Zeigler (R), who represents Mobile and six other counties on the state school board, was a teacher at the Dauphin Island School.

“This was a tragic case of pure evil. For a father to kill his own four children is unimaginable. He is allowed to live, but the four innocent angels lost their lives that day on our bridge,” Jackie Zeigler said in a statement.

This ruling comes after a nine-year appeal process.

State Auditor Jim Zeigler (R) said in a statement, “Lam Luong is an appropriate example for why we have a death penalty. He killed his four young children, but his own life has been spared by liberal policies. It was decided that his IQ is too low for execution. He knew he was mad with his wife. He knew she loved their four children. He knew the worst thing he could do to her was to kill their four children. He knew enough to take them to the Dauphin Island Bridge and throw them off. Notice with great benefit that he did not throw himself off — only the children who trusted him.”

After Luong’s conviction, the ACLU claims they uncovered extensive mitigating evidence that trial lawyers had not found, including information suggesting that he had an intellectual disability. After further exploration and testing, experts hired by the ACLU and the state of Alabama concluded that Luong did, in fact, have an intellectual disability, which would make his execution unconstitutional according to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

“Mr. Luong was convicted and sentenced to death by a process that was both unfair and unconstitutional,” said ACLU senior staff attorney Anna Arceneaux. “The trial court rushed to try Mr. Luong, a process that represented the fastest capital case to go to trial in Mobile. And in the face of intense community pressure, his lawyers and the court alike missed the obvious signs of Mr. Luong’s intellectual disability and severe mental illness.”

“Experts with both the ACLU and the state of Alabama agree that Mr. Luong meets the criteria for intellectual disability and therefore is ineligible for execution under the United States Constitution,” Arceneaux said. “Everyone deserves a fair trial — something that Mr. Luong did not have, as the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals and several judges on the Alabama Supreme Court have recognized. Today’s ruling is essential in righting that wrong.”

“Sparring Lam Luong the death penalty is not an appropriate sentence,” Auditor Zeigler concluded.

Brandon Moseley is a former reporter at the Alabama Political Reporter.

More from APR


Alabama NAACP president Benard Simelton said Trump is “definitely not a king” and called for Supreme Court term limits.


The Supreme Court's ruling that presidents cannot be prosecuted for any official acts received seemingly unanimous support from Alabama Republicans.


Sewell called the decision "disturbing and anti-democratic."


SCOTUS ruled it incorrectly decided to hear Moyle v. United States, allowing federal law to still override Idaho abortion law.