Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Featured Opinion

There are good reasons to be concerned about the killing of Suleimani

No one cares about the terrorist. 

Let me be crystal clear about that. Qassim Suleimani was an evil guy who seemed dead set on killing Americans and American allies, and I don’t much care that he’s dead. 

I felt the same way about Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi last year. And the same way about Osama bin Laden a few years ago. 

But here’s what I — and so many other Americans — do care about: Will the killing of Suleimani result in the loss of many more American lives, either through retaliatory attacks (unlikely) or outright war (growing more likely)? 

That’s how the killing of Suleimani differs from the other two. 

Al-Baghdadi and bin Laden were terrorists not tied to the governments of other countries. Suleimani was one of the highest ranking members of the Iranian government. 

Killing a man such as Suleimani, and then proclaiming that he was the intended target of the drone strike … well, let’s just say that wars have been fought over less. Far less. 

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

So, when you do something, as the President of the United States of America, that could very likely set off a war, you need to be certain that you and the U.S. armed forces and America’s intelligence agencies have prepared adequately for every possible scenario, every possible retaliation, the potential involvement of America’s other enemies around the world and the capabilities of the nation you just attacked. 

And that’s why everyone is so worried. 

Because no one in their right mind believes Donald John Trump has considered anything other than how this will look on TV. 

Trump has proven himself to be an erratic, off-the-cuff, seat-of-his-pants crazy person who is liable to do or say anything to anyone at any time, and who rarely concerns himself with the fallout or the planning for that fallout.  

For God’s sakes, to prove that he’s taking this thing really seriously, he informed Congress — the body to which he has an absolute duty to report — that they could receive his war declarations via Twitter. 

I’m not making that up. 

That is incredibly reckless. And, frankly, unacceptable for an American president. 

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

Having lived through roughly 30 years of U.S. soldiers occupying some ground in the Middle East, I have grown tired of the casual way in which we treat war — as if it’s not real life but some game that we’re sending kids out to play. And I’m insanely sick of the tough guy BS, particularly from a president who lied to get multiple deferments for alleged bone spurs, that sells the deaths of hundreds of thousands of men and women and children as a bravery test. 

Now, that said, don’t mistake my distaste for war as evidence that I am against the actions that were taken against Suleimani. Or that the Iranian response to his death has worried me. 

Honestly, I don’t care how Iranians are receiving the death of Suleimani. If you didn’t want him dead, you shouldn’t have allowed him to run a rogue terrorist organization that killed Americans. 

That guy earned exactly what he got. 

However, there are lots and lots of bad men in the world, including a whole bunch who are responsible for the deaths of Americans. We’re not killing all of them, because it wouldn’t be the responsible or safe thing to do for this country. 

Instead, we weigh such actions, have in-depth discussions and traverse the proper channels. 

Trump did none of that. Instead, the killing of Suleimani was, as usual, a chaotic decision made by a chaotic president — a decision that, according to the New York Times and other media outlets, left top Pentagon officials “shocked.” And left Congress completely in the dark. 

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

To be fair, there is a chance that the Trump administration has evidence of an imminent attack that was being planned by Suleimani. They seemed to indicate that American intelligence agencies — which Trump suddenly trusts again — presented evidence of such an attack. 

If that’s true, OK. The bad guy was killed for a good reason. End of story. 

But Congress has to get that briefing. And it has to be involved in decisions in the future, because that’s the way our government works. That’s the way we all want it to work. 

What we absolutely don’t want is a rash president who’s facing very serious — and growing more serious by each breaking news report — impeachment trial and sagging approval numbers making the crazy decision to kill by drone strike a high-ranking government official in a foreign country in order to improve the rash president’s chances to be re-elected. 

Because surely all of us are tired now of watching our friends and family members, our neighbors and cousins, our co-workers and church members being shipped halfway around the world to fight in battles in which the objective isn’t clear and the cause was manufactured, and we want to make sure it never happens again. 

And surely all of us want to know for certain that America is safe from potential counter-attacks, and that someone has planned for all possible scenarios. 

As of right now, we don’t have assurances on any of those things. 

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

And that’s why so many of us are concerned.


Josh Moon is an investigative reporter and featured columnist at the Alabama Political Reporter with years of political reporting experience in Alabama. You can email him at [email protected] or follow him on Twitter.

More from APR


This is the third indictment of the former President, which together include more than 40 separate charges.

Party politics

The Alabama Legislature would have to introduce legislation to make the recommendation a reality.


These videos should give us pause as we consider exactly what the First Amendment protects and how it should be applied.


The project was $200 million short on the bond market, and mounting public pressure could result in another underwriter backing out.