Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Economy

Bill would grant Poarch Creeks sole rights over all gaming, defying governor’s call

Despite Gov. Kay Ivey’s call for the Legislature to give her gaming study group time to bring her fact-based recommendations, Sen. Greg Albritton, R-Range, last week introduced a bill that would provide the Poarch Band of Creek Indians a monopoly, eliminates all competition and bind the state to a compact while adding comparatively little to the state’s bottom line.

Not only would Albritton’s bill grant the Poarch Creeks sole rights to Vegas-style gaming, including slots, blackjack, roulette and other table games, it would also provide the tribe exclusivity over sports betting and video lottery terminals to name a few. The bill would also outlaw bingo machines except at tribal facilities and impose new, steep tax rates and new licensing fees on dog tracks that have existed in Alabama for decades.

Perhaps without irony, Albritton brought the bill on the same day that the Governor’s Study Group on Gambling Policy held its first meeting.

Albritton makes no apologies for representing the wishes of the Poarch Creeks, calling them family. Many of his Senate colleagues refer to him as the Senator from Poarch Creek.

For months, PCI has blanketed radio, TV, print, social media and other platforms with their “Billion dollar” plan for Alabama. Albritton’s bill would provide the tribe with everything they have asked for and more.

The proposed constitutional amendment reads in part, “The proposed amendment would provide that casino-style games may be operated only pursuant to a compact between the state and the Poarch Band of Creek Indians on lands held in trust for the Poarch Band of Creek Indians and, for an initial period of 25 years, at two additional sites, one in Jefferson County and one in Marshall, Jackson, or DeKalb County operated by the Poarch Band of Creek Indians.”

According to Albritton’s bill, SB282, Poarch Creeks would be granted by law exclusive rights to offer blackjack, roulette and other table games as well as sports wagering in the state’s largest county as well as another county of their choosing. It also stipulates that PCI could open another two casinos in the state at a future date.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

Albritton’s bill would also eliminate any competition to the Poarch Creeks’ other gaming facilities by defining bingo as a game played on cards except at Poarch Creek’s casinos and outlawing bingo machines.

Perhaps most egregious, however, the bill also imposes new licensing fees and a 25-percent tax rate that must be paid by existing dog tracks— a tactic designed to force the tracks out of business.

PCI, in the meantime, would continue paying zero taxes on its three existing casinos, but would pay the 25-percent rate on any new casinos it opens off of trust lands. Two attorneys who asked not to be identified said that the federal government would never approve a compact that requires the tribe to pay such a high tax on gaming revenues. And that the state would be forced to enter an agreement at a lower tax rate than specified in the bill.

Albritton’s bill will go before the Senate Tourism Committee chaired by Senate President Pro Tem Del Marsh.

Marsh over the last two months has been trying to bring the Poarch Creeks and the state’s dog track owners together on a compromise measure, but the Poarch Creeks are holding out according to those with knowledge of the meetings.

Senate insiders say Albritton’s proposed constitutional amendment has little chance of passing but that the bill is being introduced at all raises questions.

Albritton and the Poarch Creeks are ignoring Ivey’s request that lawmakers stand down on gaming until her study group can complete its task, but to what end?

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

Those with knowledge of the Poarch Creeks’ internal discussions say Tribal Chair Stephine Bryan and Vice-Chair Robbie McGhee pushed to have the bill introduced while other members of their team disagreed with the aggressive move that could alienate Ivey and others.

Over the weekend, the Governor’s office did not weigh-in on the issue. However, in a recent appearance on The Voice of Alabama Politics, Ivey reiterated the importance of the gaming policy group and the need to have all the facts before she brings a proposal to the Legislature and citizens of the state.

A survey commissioned by the Republican Legislative Caucus found that a majority of likely Republican primary voters were against the Legislature giving the Poarch Creeks a monopoly over gaming.

Bill Britt
Written By

Bill Britt is editor-in-chief at the Alabama Political Reporter and host of The Voice of Alabama Politics. You can email him at [email protected] or follow him on Twitter.

DIG DEEPER

Health

Dr. Scott Harris said hospitals "by and large are out" of vaccines and largely only have enough for required second doses.

Opinion

"The distribution of vaccines to Alabama will continue to be interrupted until Alabama plays by the rules."

Featured Opinion

"Ivey and this Legislature did not cause this problem. It has been building up and festering for years."

Aerospace and Defense

Even before the Air Force's official announcement was released, Colorado leaders were calling foul.