Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

News

Five people indicted on conspiracy to transport illegal aliens

The maximum penalty for conspiracy to transport illegal aliens within the United States is 10 years in prison.

(STOCK PHOTO)

A federal grand jury indicted five individuals on Tuesday for transporting illegal aliens within the United States, federal prosecutors said.

U.S. Attorney Prim F. Escalona and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Homeland Security Investigations Special Agent in Charge Robert Hammer announced the indictments Wednesday.

A three-count indictment was filed in U.S. District Court charging the indicted with conspiracy to transport illegal aliens within the United States, for unlawful employment of illegal aliens and money laundering.

The five individuals charged were: Crystal Gail Escalante, age 37 of Haleyville; Deivin Marquitos Escalante-Vasques, age 30 of Haleyville; Adan Riz-Simaj, age 33; Carlos Gutierrez-Gabriel, age 23; and Tomas Gabriel-Adjualip, age 30.

According to the indictment, between January 2018 and October 2020, the defendants transported and employed illegal aliens in Walker and Winston counties.

The maximum penalty for conspiracy to transport illegal aliens within the United States is 10 years in prison. The maximum penalty for unlawful employment of illegal aliens is 10 years in prison. The maximum penalty for money laundering is 20 years in prison.

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Homeland Security Investigations investigated the case. Assistant U.S. Attorney Russell Penfield is prosecuting the case.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

An indictment contains only charges. All the defendants are entitled to a vigorous defense and are presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty.

Brandon Moseley is a former reporter at the Alabama Political Reporter.

Advertisement
Advertisement

More from APR

Courts

The arraignment hearing in the Department of Justice’s case against the SPLC is set for May 7.

Courts

The filings argued federal officials misstated the group’s work with law enforcement and may have tainted both the indictment and the case.

Courts

Advocacy and legal groups cast the case as political retaliation, warning it threatened civil society and efforts to confront extremism.

Courts

Prosecutors alleged the civil rights watchdog hid payments to infiltrators, while the organization said secrecy protected sources and helped prevent violence.