Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Elections

Groups condemn SCOTUS allowing Alabama’s new congressional maps to stand

A lawsuit alleges those maps likely violate the Voting Rights Act because they maintain just one majority-minority congressional district.

Maps on the Alabama Senate during a special session on redistricting. (JOHN H. GLENN/APR)

Several groups expressed concern over the U.S. Supreme Court’s 5-4 vote Monday to allow Alabama’s new Republican-drawn congressional district maps to remain, despite a lawsuit that alleges the maps likely violate the Voting Rights Act. 

Those 2021 maps drawn by Republicans in Alabama maintain just one majority-minority congressional district, which plaintiffs in the case argue is discriminatory to Black voters. Black people make up 27 percent of the Alabama population, yet Alabama’s new maps maintain a 14-percent minority representation, according to the most recent census figures. 

“The League of Women Voters of Alabama is deeply disappointed that Alabama continues using racially gerrymandered congressional maps which violate Section 2 of the voting rights act,” Kathy Jones, president of the League of Women Voters Alabama, said in a statement. 

JaTaune Bosby, ACLU Alabama’s executive director, said in a statement that the decision shows the need for federal legislation to protect and expand voter access.

“It is unfortunate that this decision will impact the people of Alabama in 2022, and voters will be forced to wait another election cycle for fair maps to be put in place,” Bosby said. “But the case will continue, and we hope that the Supreme Court does not ultimately interfere with the salience of Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act. This just demonstrates the need for federal legislation to protect and expand voter access now – it is the only way Black voters and other historically disenfranchised communities to have a fair chance to elect candidates of their choice.”

The Founders of the Alabama Election Protection Network Rodreshia Russaw, Sheila Tyson and Justin Vest in a joint statement condemned the ruling. 

“We all watched in November as the Alabama State Legislature said the Lord’s prayer and then the majority party, the Republicans, proceeded to pass maps that continued Alabama’s long-standing tradition of intentionally diluting the electoral power of Black Alabamians,’ the statement reads. “The ruling on Monday by the Supreme Court, allowing Alabama to use maps deemed faulty based on race by a federal court, is deeply disturbing.”

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.
Written By

Eddie Burkhalter is a reporter at the Alabama Political Reporter. You can email him at [email protected] or reach him via Twitter.

DIG DEEPER

State

“People are going to die if it’s not legal,” Margeaux Hartline said. “People are going to do unsavory things to get an abortion.”

Courts

Criticize the Court for perhaps not practicing what it preaches as it erects its fences, but heed its sermon.  

Courts

Eric Johnston, who authored the 2019 abortion ban in question, said the process could move very quickly.

Courts

Alabama Republicans praised the chance at overturning the landmark decision, but expressed concern about the draft being leaked.