Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Legislature

Bathroom bill passes House

Proponents claim boys entering girls’ bathrooms is a safety concern that schools are afraid to address for fear of lawsuit.

(STOCK)

Students in kindergarten through 12th grade will soon be required to use the bathroom that aligns with their biological sex if the bill passes the Senate.

The House voted the bill through Tuesday 74-24 after two hours of debate. It was the third and final controversial bill brought by Republicans Tuesday under a special cloture calendar that preemptively limited debate on all bills to two hours.

The bill requires students to use the bathroom that reflects the sex assigned on their birth certificate. 

There was debate over whether the bill is specifically designed to target transgender students.

“There is nothing in this bill that says anything about transgender,” said sponsor Rep. Scott Stadthagen, R-Hartselle. However, he conceded that the bill does affect transgender students regardless of no language in the bill explicitly stating the word “transgender.”

When pressed on the motivation behind the bill, Stadthagen always returned to “keeping males out of female bathrooms.”

Several Republicans, including Stadthagen, said they want to keep their daughters and granddaughters safe.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

“My daughters are all school-aged,” said Rep. Jamie Kiel, Russellville. “Currently it’s possible a boy could be using the same bathroom as my daughter. I protect my daughters at home as best I can. This is the one time I’m not allowed to go into school, I’m not there to protect her. Hopefully a School Resource Officer or teacher is. If it’s illegal to protect them, what are we doing in society if we have to check birth certificates to decide whether to go to bathroom?”

Stadthagen once again mentioned having seven cases showing sexual assault by males against females in school restrooms, and upon questioning specified those cases to the body. None of the cases mention anything about the assailants identifying as an opposite gender or getting permission to use an opposite-gender restroom.

“This bill just makes a scapegoat of an already vulnerable population of the youth that you have no business incorporating into your big old idealogical agenda,” said Rep. Neil Rafferty, D-Birmingham. “All you’re doing is demonizing an already vulnerable population under the guise of protecting children to win cheap political points.”

Although other Democrats voiced opposition to the bill, several Democrats who took the stand said they agree that boys should not be using girls’ bathrooms.

Stadthagen also once again alluded to a scenario in which a student showed up to an Alabama school with parents and attorneys and told the administration that the student born male now identifies as female and will use the female bathroom. Stadthagen said the administration tried to accommodate the student by allowing use of the faculty restroom, but the student’s representation refused, calling that discrimination.

Stadthagen told members this is a problem in every school he contacted, including a rural school of 300 students where the principal said six students are challenging administration over where to use the bathroom.

A text message read to the members, supposedly written by an Alabama teacher, says students have accepted the faculty bathroom accommodation, causing other students to also use it and making it hard for faculty to have access to the restroom.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

Stadthagen said schools are “afraid of being sued by the ACLU” and are “bending over backward” to accommodate students.

This bill will give schools the power to implement bathroom policy with backup from Alabama law, he said.

The bill now moves to the Senate for consideration.

Written By

Jacob Holmes is a reporter at the Alabama Political Reporter. You can reach him at [email protected]

DIG DEEPER

Courts

Trump-appointed U.S. District Judge Liles Burke found that the plaintiffs are substantially likely to win their case on multiple grounds.

Health

A federal judge is debating whether to grant a preliminary injunction, putting a temporary halt to the law, which went into effect Sunday.

Courts

It has already accrued a number of lawsuits challenging its legality since its passage during the 2022 legislative session.

Courts

The complaint alleges that the law violates the Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause.