Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Courts

SCOTUS decision on Alabama’s congressional districts to come within the month

The decision could impact the state’s congressional districts as soon as the 2026 election.

A map shows the current layout of Alabama's congressional districts. (Dave's Redistricting)

Last October, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments from the State of Alabama and the organizations challenging the state’s 2021 congressional redistricting process.

Now the court is finally in the ruling phase, with a decision expected to come down before the end of June.

Evan Milligan, executive director fo Alabama Forward and primary plaintiff in the case, said the U.S. Supreme Court should side with the lower court, which unanimously agreed with the plaintiffs that the state’s method violated Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act.

“In this instance, Black Alabamians make up 27 percent of our population but only one of seven congressional districts features a majority Black voting-age population,” Milligan said. “Is that inherently wrong? You have to look at it; between the Supreme Court and Congress, they’ve come up with formulas and methods to look at those numbers and see if it’s just a coincidence, just the math— or is something going on to dilute the representation of Black people? We overwhelmingly convinced a federal court in Alabama–with two of the three judges appointed by Donald Trump—convinced them unanimously using those formulas and methods that the state had violated section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, diluting the strength of Black Alabamians.”

The state has pushed a theory that the 14th Amendment requires the state to draw district lines without regard to race and explained that race was not a factor that was visible when drawing the lines.

The court’s newest justice Ketanji Brown Jackson openly questioned that line of reasoning during the state’s oral arguments, saying the 14th Amendment itself is conscious of race based on contemporary discussions.

“The same state also argued in its same brief that creating a second district majority black population would violate the voting rights of descendants of  French settlers that make up a unique ethnic cultural group if split between districts,” Milligan said. “So in the same brief the state said ‘don’t consider race, but only consider race when it comes to white people.’ That is not reflective of the best of Alabama.”

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

Jacob Holmes is a reporter at the Alabama Political Reporter. You can reach him at [email protected]

More from APR

Elections

Allen's stance centers on the claim that actions in Colorado and Maine, which are the focal points of this case, do not align with...

Featured Opinion

The top 5 stories Josh Moon covered during 2023.

Courts

The ruling allows a Louisiana redistricting case to continue and sets up a potential clash at the U.S. Supreme Court.

Courts

Marshall filed a brief in the federal court case involving Trump that opposes a request to expedite the case to the U.S. Supreme Court.