Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Congress

State to pay $3M in plaintiffs’ attorney fees in Congressional redistricting suit

The expense is added to an already hefty bill for the suit, with the state paying outside counsel to assist.

The VRA Remedial Plan map.

The State of Alabama agreed Monday to pay $3 million in attorney’s fees to the plaintiffs in a lawsuit that resulted in a special master drawing new Congressional district lines.

The legal battle over the map has been expensive, with the state bringing in outside counsel to help make its case  that it had not violated Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act in drawing either challenged map.

The state’s arguments were rejected at each level of court. The U.S. Supreme Court allowed a lower federal panel’s order to go into effect that required state lawmakers to enter a special session to draw a new map. When the panel dismissed the new map as failing to fix the issues, the Supreme Court denied to take up the state’s appeal.

The new map has created a newly competitive 2nd Congressional District seat, with the race  underway between Democratic nominee Shomari Figures and Republican nominee Caroline Dobson.

The new district isn’t quite majority-minority, but it is much closer than what Alabama lawmakers had come up with and what the court found to violate the Voting Rights Act by disenfranchising Black voters. 

The settlement satisfies the attorney fees for all of the court action that has happened thus far in the case, but the case technically remains active. The state could still be on the hook for any future fees incurred by the plaintiffs if the suit is litigated further.

Jacob Holmes is a reporter at the Alabama Political Reporter. You can reach him at [email protected]

More from APR

Courts

The lawsuit pertains to a Selma resident who carried a gun into a "gun-free zone" in Selma last year.

Courts

It is now a felony to sell smokable hemp products in Alabama.

Courts

APLS chair John Wahl praised the decision as checking a "socialist agenda ... that wants to reshape American values."

Courts

Following many controversial decisions this term, the Supreme Court decided to send voting rights case Louisiana v. Callais for reargument.