Connect with us

Guest Columnists

Did the race for Lt. Governor end before it began?

Larry Lee



By Larry Lee
Education Matters

Candidates for election in 2018 have now turned in their first monthly financial report to the Secretary of State.  This covers the month of June.

These include the three announced Republican candidates for Lt. Governor–Will Ainsworth, Mary Scott Hunter and Rusty Glover.  The differences in the reports are astounding and do not bode well for either Hunter of Glover.


At the start of the reporting period, Hunter had a beginning balance of $50,000.  However, she only raised $6,720 while spending $7,076 and ended up with less in the bank than she had a month earlier.  Glover’s numbers tell about the same story.  He started with $60,911, raised $13,801 and spent $19,199 to leave a balance of $55,513.

On the other hand, Ainsworth raised money hand over fist.  He began with $50,000, raised $355,110, spent $10,248 and ended with $394,861.  This means he has eight times as much on hand as Hunter and seven times as much as Glover.

Both Hunter and Glover had only three contributions of $1,000 or more.  By comparison, Ainsworth had 81 in the same category and had 38 who contributed $5,000 or more.

This is about like looking at the scoreboard at the end of the first quarter and seeing the score is 35 to 0.  This doesn’t mean the other team can’t catch up.  But it ain’t very likely.

Ainsworth is ending his first term in the House of Representatives while Glover is in his third term as a state senator from Mobile.  Hunter was elected to the state board of education in 2010.

While I have seen no polling numbers as to name recognition for any of the three, it’s likely that all are very, very low.  Which means the ability to raise campaign funding is CRITICAL.  If you don’t have name recognition, you have to buy it.  And at this point, neither Hunter or Glover are competitive with Ainsworth in the ability to do so.

I have been through more political battles than I care to recall.  And have the scars to prove it.  Along the way I was involved in raising more than $1 million in contributions.  It is said that “money is the mother’s milk of politics.”  I agree.

It is nearly impossible to raise substantial funds when the perception is that you are behind 35-0 at the end of the first quarter.  Checks that should have been for $1,000 become ones for $100 instead.  And anyone who thinks they can compete equally with an opponent with substantially more money is delusional.

Right now the general public is paying no attention whatsoever to a June 2018 primary.  But some media will and certainly some of the key Montgomery political operatives are.

A cardinal rule of politics is that “big money invests, little money gives.”  Which means that even though your brother-in-law doesn’t think you have a snowball’s chance  of winning, he will still give you $100.  But that is not how someone who directs a large political action committee thinks.  They want return on investment.  They would rather keep their money in the bank than spend it on a losing candidate.

Two of the major PACs in Alabama are FARM PAC (Alabama Farmers Federation) and PROGRESS PAC (Business Council of Alabama).  They also file financial reports.  At this point in this election cycle they are raising money and studying candidates carefully.

At the end of June FARM PAC had $1.6 million in their bank account.  They made no contributions to candidates.  PROGRESS PAC had $1.8 million on hand and also did not contribute to any candidates.  They paid McLaughlin & Associates, one of the country’s top political research and polling firms, $29,000 in June.

Of course it is about 11 months to the primary for Lt. Governor and much can change.  But if this fund-raising trend continues like this for a couple of more months. the fat lady will be getting ready to sing and Ainsworth will be deciding how to decorate the Lt. Governor’s office.


Continue Reading

Guest Columnists

Opinion | A tax code that works

Bradley Byrne



Each April, Americans across the country face great frustration and inconvenience in filing their taxes.

Fortunately, this Tax Day marked the last time Americans would file their taxes under the old tax code.  Thanks to passage of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, Americans will now have a simpler and fairer tax code. I was proud to work with President Trump to reform our tax code and make the process easier for taxpayers.

Starting next year, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act will bring Americans relief when filing their taxes under a more streamlined, straightforward tax code.  However, making the overall filing process simpler and more convenient was just one of the many ways we worked to create a tax code that benefits and works for the American people.


One of the most important reforms under the new tax code is the doubling of the standard deduction.  This provision increases the standard deduction to $12,000 for individuals and $24,000 for married couples.  Combined with new lower tax rates, almost every Alabamian should see a tax decrease.

Also important, the new tax code prioritizes American families by doubling the Child Tax Credit from $1,000 to $2,000 per child.  It is no secret that raising a family is not cheap; so, this increase provides additional support for families struggling to pay for childcare and other necessary expenses associated with parenting.

To provide even more support for families, the bill preserves the Child and Dependent Care Tax Credit, as well as the Adoption Tax Credit.  Even more, the bill makes improvements to saving options for education by allowing parents to use 529 accounts to save for elementary, secondary, and higher education.

Most people will not have to wait until the next tax season to see the impact of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.  Already, many hardworking Alabamians are seeing more money in their paychecks each month.  That means your hard-earned money is ending up back in your pockets, rather than the coffers of the federal government.

Tax reform has also helped spur overall economic growth. Our bill helps to level the playing field for American businesses, creating new job opportunities and finally causing wages to rise after years of stagnation.

Many businesses have also handed out bonuses and improved benefits to their workforce. Since passage of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, I have had the pleasure of personally handing out bonus checks at multiple businesses in Southwest Alabama. Trust me, these workers were thrilled with the extra money.

 We aren’t stopping now either. The House passed a package of bills last week to help cut down on identity theft and to hold criminals accountable for IRS scams. It is important that these crooks be punished for trying to defraud hardworking Americans, including our nation’s senior citizens.

Equally important, the House also passed bills to make the IRS more efficient, effective, and accountable. The IRS should be a customer-friendly organization that responds to the questions and concerns of the American people.

In the past four months, we have seen tremendous growth right here in Southwest Alabama because of the Tax Cuts & Jobs Act.  From our small business owners handing out bonus checks to our single-income families taking home extra money in their paychecks, evidence shows that allowing Americans to keep more of their hard-earned money is a huge boom for our economy.

As we bid farewell to an old, outdated tax code, Americans can rest easy knowing they have a simpler, fairer tax code to work with in the future.

Continue Reading

Guest Columnists

Opinion | Preserving our history to protect our future

Gerald Allen



Doing the right thing isn’t always politically expedient, but a strong leader does what’s necessary regardless of her critics. Governor Kay Ivey exemplifies this kind of no-nonsense leadership.

Last year, our state faced a difficult decision: should we listen to the politically-correct, out-of-state pundits or do what’s best for the future of Alabama?

All across Alabama, we have monuments and statues that tell our storied past. Many of these moments have affected our entire nation and shaped us to be who we are today. History doesn’t just tell us where we’ve been, it often provides signals and warnings for how to avoid repeating past errors. As George Santayana once wrote, “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.”


Nearly one year ago, I sponsored the Alabama Memorial Preservation Act, a law that protects historic monuments and memorials in Alabama from thoughtless destruction.

More specifically, the Memorial Preservation Act prohibits the destruction or alteration of public monuments older than forty years, and established a standing committee to hear waiver requests from cities and counties, while historic artifacts under the control of museums, archives, libraries, and universities were specifically exempted from the prohibition against removal or alteration.

This law is the result of countless discussions with other legislators, historians, and interested citizens, and the intent is to preserve memorials to all of Alabama’s history – including the Civil War, the World Wars, and the Civil Rights movement – for generations to come.

We’ve seen a wave of political correctness sweep the nation, and too often, these attempts have resulted in re-writing of the American story. This politically-correct movement to strike whole periods of the past from our collective memory is divisive and unnecessary. In order to understand our complete history and where we are today, we have to tell it as it happened.

As a lawmaker, I believe it is incumbent upon us to preserve our state’s history, and I am grateful that Governor Ivey, in the face of criticism, stood up for the thoughtful preservation of Alabama’s history – the good and the bad. As father and grandfather, I am especially grateful she understood the importance of our children and grandchildren learning from the past, so they can create a better future.

Sen. Gerald Allen serves Senate District 21 which includes: Lamar County, Pickens County,and Tuscaloosa County.

Continue Reading

Guest Columnists

Opinion | The push for a balanced budget

Bradley Byrne



When the 115th Congress kicked off last January, I immediately introduced a bill that I believe is fundamental to the future of our country: a Balanced Budget Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

The premise of a Balanced Budget Amendment is pretty straightforward. The federal government should not be allowed to spend more than we take in, except in extraordinary circumstances like a time of war.

This isn’t some sort of far flung idea. When I served in the Alabama State Legislature, we were required to pass a balanced budget each year. It was not always easy, but it was the law. The vast majority of states have the same requirement.


Balancing a budget is also a common occurrence for families in Alabama and across the United States. Every month, people sit around their kitchen table to figure out how to make ends meet and live within their means. Small businesses must do the same.

The federal government should have to play by the same rules.

To truly enact a Balanced Budget Amendment, we would need to add an amendment to the U.S. Constitution. As a reminder, in order to amend the Constitution, the Balanced Budget Amendment must pass both the House and the Senate by a two-thirds majority and then be ratified by three-fourths of the states, which is 38 out of the 50 states. The only other way to amend the Constitution would be through a constitutional convention called for by two-thirds of the states.

Recently, the House voted on House Joint Resolution 2, proposing a Balanced Budget Amendment to the Constitution. Despite receiving the support of a majority of us in the House, the bill did not receive the two-thirds majority necessary under the Constitution.

I was deeply disappointed that most Democrats in the House opposed the Balanced Budget Amendment. Despite talking a lot about our debt, they rejected one of the best opportunities to actually restore fiscal sanity in Washington.

Throughout the course of the debate, two important topics were raised, and I wanted to briefly address each of them.

First, despite what my colleagues on the other side of the aisle believe, the answer to our debt issues is not to tax the American people more. We do not have a tax problem; we have a spending problem.

To be clear, the recently passed tax cuts are not to blame for our nation’s debt issues. As the Heritage Foundation recently pointed out, “tax revenue is expected to fall by only 0.7 percent of gross domestic product (GDP) this year and spending is expected to climb by 3 percent of GDP.” Again, we have a spending problem, not a taxing problem.

Second, the most serious drivers of the national debt are on autopilot. For example, if you eliminated every penny Congress appropriated for defense spending next year, the federal government would still be projected to operate in a deficit.   So-called mandatory spending programs must be reined in, and a balanced budget amendment would finally require Congress to tackle those programs head on.

Now, I know passing a balanced budget would be hard, but I did not run for Congress because I thought the job would be easy. We were elected by our neighbors to make difficult choices and decisions.

So, while our recent effort to pass a Balanced Budget Amendment came up short, I will not let it stop me from continuing to push for a balanced budget that requires the federal government to live within our means, just like the American people.

Continue Reading






Did the race for Lt. Governor end before it began?

by Larry Lee Read Time: 3 min