Connect with us


Moore asks Jones why he still supports DACA and opposes border wall

Brandon Moseley



By Brandon Moseley
Alabama Political Reporter

The Roy Moore Campaign asked Jones why, “In light of the tragic not-guilty verdict for Jose Ines Garcia Zarate, the illegal immigrant who murdered Kate Steinle, why do you oppose securing the border and support DACA and other amnesty measures that will attract more illegal immigrants?”

The Moore campaign accused Jones of being silent following the jury verdict freeing Zarate for the murder of young Kate Steinle.


Moore said, “Yesterday’s outrageous ruling was a complete travesty of justice and a shameful admission that San Francisco cares more for criminal aliens than they do for innocent American women and until Congress moves to crack down on sanctuary cities, illegal immigration, and border security, no American can be safe”

“I am thankful for the strong leadership of President Trump, and as your next United States senator, rest assured that I will do all within my power to secure our border, build the border wall, put an immediate end to so-called ‘sanctuary cities’ that put Americans at risk, strongly oppose all amnesty including DACA and the DREAM Act, and work to pass Kate’s Law to crack down on criminal illegals like Zarate who unlawfully return to our country,” Moore said.  “My opponent supports amnesty and has stated that he sees no need for a border wall and has said nothing about sanctuary cities.  His election would be a threat to the safety and well-being of the people of Alabama and the United States at large.”

The Moore campaign accused Doug Jones of being an outspoken opponent of building a wall to secure our border and of consistently supporting DACA, the DREAM Act, and other amnesty measures that will only encourage more illegal immigration.

Zarate is a felon who had been deported from the United States five times before he fatally shot Kate Steinle in the back in 2015.

U.S. Representative Martha Roby, R-Montgomery, said, “Kate Steinle was a young woman who was tragically and senselessly killed by a criminal illegal immigrant who had already been deported numerous times.  This disappointing verdict should serve as a harsh reminder that sanctuary policies, like those that exist in San Francisco where Kate was murdered, are unlawful at best and very, very dangerous to American communities.”

President Donald Trump said, “The Kate Steinle killer came back and back over the weakly protected Obama border, always committing crimes and being violent, and yet this info was not used in court. His exoneration is a complete travesty of justice. BUILD THE WALL!”  “A disgraceful verdict in the Kate Steinle case! No wonder the people of our Country are so angry with Illegal Immigration.”

Following the shocking verdict, U.S. Attorney Jeff Sessions said, “It seems like to me that it wouldn’t take five minutes to pass the Kate Steinle bill that passed out of the House with a good vote.” Sessions told Fox News host Tucker Carlson, “It shouldn’t take any time to pass additional legislation that would provide greater incentive and greater pressure on cities that are failing to cooperate with the federal government in basic immigration law.  So yes, I don’t see any basis for not moving this and would love to see them move it, they’ve got the tax bill right now. But as soon as possible, I would like to see this legislation be advanced in the Senate.”

The U.S. House of Representatives passed a measure known as “Kate’s Law” this summer, which would increase maximum prison penalties for illegal immigrants who continue to enter the U.S. Democratic Senators are opposing the measure.

Democrats refusal to work with the president on taxes and on the border apparently led to Trump giving his full endorsement to Moore on Monday.

“Democrats refusal to give us even one vote for massive Tax Cuts is why we need Republican Roy Moore to win in Alabama,” Trump tweeted. “We need his vote on stopping crime, illegal immigration, Border Wall, Military, Pro Life, V.A., Judges 2nd Amendment and more. No to Jones, a Pelosi/Schumer Puppet!”

The president also attacked  Moore’s Democratic opponent Doug Jones, “Putting Pelosi/Schumer Liberal Puppet Jones into office in Alabama would hurt our great Republican Agenda of low on taxes, tough on crime, strong on military and borders…& so much more.”

Moore will face Jones  in the Senate special election in one week. Moore was twice elected as chief justice of the Alabama Supreme Court.  Jones was appointed as an U.S. Attorney by President Bill Clinton.  The Senate vacancy was created after Trump appointed Sessions as U.S. attorney general.

Continue Reading


Don’t look away just yet, HB317 is still around

Chip Brownlee



House Bill 317, a controversial piece of legislation that has received pushback from both sides of the aisle and prompted threats of a filibuster, never made it to the Senate floor on Thursday, raising questions about whether the bill was still alive.

It is.

Even though lawmakers would need to raise to get the bill through both chambers by the Legislature’s self-imposed deadline next week, HB317 is still in the works.


Senate President Pro Tem Del Marsh, who’s carrying the legislation in the Senate, had planned for HB317 to be on the floor Thursday, but instead, senators spent much of the day crafting a substitute in an effort to appease other objecting senators, according to Marsh.

It isn’t clear what’s in the substitute, but senators will continue working over the weekend and could bring the legislation back to the floor next Tuesday when lawmakers will return for what is expected to be the final week of the session.

Sen. Dick Brewbaker, R-Montgomery, threatened to filibuster the bill Thursday. Combined with several other Democrats and Republicans who threatened the same — and others in the Republican caucus who said they wouldn’t vote for cloture — the effort got the bill pulled from the special order calendar.

Brewbaker said he is now part negotiations on the substitute, but wouldn’t be part of writing it.

“I told them I wasn’t going to help write it, because if you help write the sub you’re supposed to vote for it,” Brewbaker said.

The Montgomery Republican said the bill’s proponents need to get back to the original intent of the bill, which was to carve out a narrow exception for a very narrow range of people — professional site selectors — who are involved in economic development. Those individuals wouldn’t need to register as lobbyists, the bill would clarify.

Instead, the bill morphed into a vast one intended to enhance the state’s ability to perform economic development. By the same token, the bill also expanded to include provisions that exempt any “full-time” or “less-than-full-time” person classified as an “economic development professional” from having to register as a lobbyist, thus exempting them from the ethics law as well.

Instead of creating a small class of fewer than 50 people, the current version of the bill creates a broad class of individuals exempt from the ethics law who do — or say they do — pretty much any economic development.

Had the bill remained a narrowly drawn exception for only professional site selectors, Brewbaker said “everyone” would have supported it.

“Nobody has any problem with that,” Brewbaker said. “Everybody understands why it needs to be done, and, in fact, up until a few months ago, they didn’t have to register as lobbyists. And under the law, to be honest with you, the only reason there’s any confusion now is because the Ethics Commission won’t do its job and render a decision.”

Sen. Trip Pittman, R-Montrose, said he doesn’t support the bill because he has a general opposition economic development and incentives, which this bill would potentially bolster through allowing for bonds for industrial development and site preparation.

“I believe in free enterprise, and I don’t believe in subsidy and incentives,” Pittman said. “I think we need an overall good environment for businesses and individuals to succeed based on their effort and merit.”

Pittman said he also had concerns about transparency in the bill — what are the costs of the projects and what are the returns on what the Legislature is giving away.

“That’s oftentimes hard to determine on these projects,” Pittman said.

While the bill would clarify that economic development professionals are not lobbyists, Pittman said inherently some of what they do is lobbying.

“Part of what they do is to lobby, to advocate for legislation and to advocate for money in addition to the already approved incentives,” Pittman said. “That’s the question on how to create transparency but at the same time, there is some confidentiality in this process.”

The bill would allow for some economic development negotiations confidential in order to protect the projects.

“Some of that need is real but some of it is an opportunity for mischief,” Pittman said.

There is also concern the bill would allow lawmakers to skirt the revolving door statutes in the state’s ethics laws, which prevent lawmakers from registering as lobbyists for two years.

Pittman said he was less concerned about that provision because the Senate has a rule that prevents former lawmakers from lobbying for two years.

“You’re still an ex-senator,” Pittman said. “I think that’s the misunderstanding on the bill is that you can’t just wear different hats. Everything you’re involved in applies.”

Pittman has already been working on the bill, getting an amendment passed Wednesday that would allow for incentives to be tracked once they’re claimed. He said he will need to see what is in the substitute next week before he decides whether to support the bill.

“I still have serious concerns about the bill, and I’m going to withhold judgment until I see the final substitute,” Pittman said.

Brewbaker said if the leadership insists on keeping all of the extra language in the bill, he won’t feel support it and will likely threaten another filibuster on Tuesday — an act that could potentially derail the rest of the session if he’s joined be enough of his colleagues.

“It’s not just me, there’s a ton of opposition,” Brewbaker said. “They don’t have a chance unless they significantly alter that bill.”


Continue Reading


“Zombie Bill” thought dead, juvenile justice reform bill resurfaces in Alabama Senate

Chip Brownlee



The Senate Judiciary Committee meets on Thursday, March 22, 2018. (Chandler Walker/APR)

Previously thought to be dead for this legislative session, a massive rewrite of Alabama’s juvenile justice statutes surfaced in the Senate Judiciary Committee Thursday, again raising the possibility that the legislation may make it into the law books this year.

The House passed the legislation last week.

“For a while there this bill has been alive and dead, then brought back to life and dead again. It’s come back and forth, and it has been called the Zombie Bill,” Ward said. “Just two days ago we were told the bill was dead for the session. Forty-eight hours later, we’re told it’s still in play.”


The bill, sponsored by Rep. Jim Hill, R-Odenville, was the result of a Juvenile Justice Task Force created by Gov. Kay Ivey. Hill, a retired judge in St. Clair County, and other members of the task force, worked for months to create a package to reform provisions in Alabama’s law that proponents of the bill say unfairly treats minors.

HB225 would expand early intervention programs and would cut back on the number of minors sent to youth detention facilities. Every minor that would enter the juvenile courts would need a risk and needs determination under the bill.

“This is something that is a year-long work in progress,” Hill said. “The juvenile justice acts in this state have not been looked at in 10 years.”

Hill said 60 percent of children who are sent to the Department of Youth Services detention facilities are low-level offenders convicted of Class C or D misdemeanors.

“The kids we send to DYS, oftentimes, we would not send to prison if they were 25 years old,” Hill said.

Proponents say that the bill would allow for funds saved by reduced incarceration of children to be used for local community intervention programs.

“We can either stick with the status quo, which some will do, or we can try to make some positive changes going forward,” Ward said.

The bill is more than 80 pages long, and some have accused Ward, Hill and Democratic Sen. Vivian Figures of trying to shove through a bill without proper vetting.

“This is a big bill, that’s why it took 15 months to work on with more than 16 different stakeholders across the state,” Ward said. “Do we have more work to do? I think we do, but we’ve got to put our nose to the ground and start to do it.”

Four amendments were added to the bill Thursday. All of them were largely technical amendments. The biggest amendment added Thursday was a compromise between DYS and county commissions on how to pay for the cost of transferring youth offenders.

Ward said the bill is still a work in progress, but would go a long way in reducing the number of incarcerated youth offenders.

“The big part of it is, the cost of those who you won’t be locking up — it costs us about $160,000 to lock up a non-violent juvenile — that money can be reinvested back into diversion and treatment programs for non-violent youthful offenders,” Ward said.

Ward said it would save money in the long term as well. Studies show that youthful offenders sent to detention services have a higher rate of recidivism than those who aren’t.

“That saves us so much money in the long term as well by not having them continue out of juvenile into the adult corrections system,” Ward said.

Money saved would be distributed on an as-needed basis depending on the need of local community intervention programs. Ward said the change would be better than a distribution formula because that would split the money between some counties that already have enough funds and others that are broke.

“You’re not going to be guaranteed locked into anything, and I think that’s wise, because if you’re locking in numbers, you’ll spread it so thin across the state that it won’t make any difference anywhere,” Ward said.

Ward said the money could also be invested into new programs to tackle crime among youthful offenders.


Continue Reading


Ivey signs pay raises into law

Brandon Moseley



Thursday, Alabama Gov. Kay Ivey signed into law bills providing pay raises for state employees, education employees and a one-time bonus for retired state employees; joining her for the signing were the sponsors of the bills.

“We cannot have an effective state government without excellent employees. I am proud to have proposed the first raise for state employees to pass in close to a decade and I appreciate the work of the legislature in approving the pay increase as well as a one-time bonus for retired state employees,” Ivey said. “Our teachers mold our children and thus our teachers mold our future – that’s why I proposed a teacher pay raise and why I am pleased to sign it into law.”

House Bill 174 was sponsored by state Rep. Bill Poole, R-Tuscaloosa, and carried in the Senate by Sen. Arthur Orr, R-Decatur. HB174 enacts a 2.5 percent salary increase for public education employees of K-12 public schools, the Alabama Institute for Deaf and Blind, the Department of Youth Services School District, the Alabama School of Fine Arts, the Alabama High School of Mathematics and Science and the two-year post-secondary institutions under the Board of Trustees for the Community College System, effective Oct. 1, 2018.


Senate Bill 185 was sponsored by Sen. Clyde Chambliss, R-Prattville, and carried in the House by state Rep. Dimitri Polizos, R-Montgomery. SB185 enacts a three percent salary increase for state employees and appellate judges effective beginning Oct. 1, 2018.

Senate Bill 215 was sponsored by Sen. Gerald Dial, R-Lineville, and carried in the Alabama House by state Rep. Connie Rowe, R-Jasper. SB215 grants a one-time lump-sum bonus of one dollar per month for each year of service to Employees’ Retirement System retirees whose effective date of retirement is prior to May 1, 2018, or their beneficiaries. This one-time bonus will be granted during Fiscal Year 2018.

State employees and teachers have not gotten many raises since before the Great Recession of 2008 to 2009, but the state has avoided prorating the budgets since 2011.

The 2019 fiscal year budget is the second largest in state history, being surpassed only by the 2007 budget.

Continue Reading






Moore asks Jones why he still supports DACA and opposes border wall

by Brandon Moseley Read Time: 4 min