Senators vote nearly unanimously to do away with marriage licenses

January 17, 2018

By Chip Brownlee
Alabama Political Reporter

Marriage licenses and state-mandated marriage ceremonies may soon be a thing of the past if the Alabama Senate has anything to say about.

The Alabama Senate voted Tuesday to approve a bill that would abolish the requirement for marriage licenses and allow two people to enter into a marriage by signing an affidavit instead of through a ceremony.

The move comes after years of back and forth among some probate judges who have refused to issue licenses at all following the Supreme Court’s 2015 ruling recognizing same-sex couples’ right to marry. The judges argued that they didn’t want to issue licenses to gay couples, so they just wouldn’t issue them at all.

Read More

Bill to take State out of Marriage License Business passes Senate

March 8, 2017

By Brandon Moseley
Alabama Political Reporter

Tuesday, March 6, 2017, the Alabama Senate passed SB20, sponsored by Senator Greg Albritton (R-Bay Minette) that would end marriage licensing in Alabama.

Sen. Albritton said previously, “This bill does not denigrate marriage. This bill does not de-sanctify marriage. This bill does not change the definition of marriage. All my bill does is to change the procedure for individuals to obtain a marriage.”

Albritton said that currently you go to the Probate Judges office to get a marriage license from the State of Alabama, this bill just removes the licensure part out of the process. This bill does not de-sanctify marriage, because the State can not sanctify marriage. Albritton’s bill would make it where you simply fill out a form with the signatures of the two people being married, the person performing the procedure, and two witnesses.
Read More

Judge Granade Orders Probate Judges to Follow Supreme Court Ruling

July 2, 2015

By Brandon Moseley
Alabama Political Reporter

Wednesday, July 1, 2015, Federal District Judge Callie Granade issued orders to all probate judges in the State of Alabama to immediately begin issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples. Judge Granade’s order confirms that her injunction applies to all of Alabama’s probate judges. 

Judge Granade stated: “By the language set forth in the order, the preliminary injunction is now in effect and binding on all members of the Defendant Class.”
Read More

Cohen Demands Moore Fire Johnson

July 1, 2015

 

By Brandon Moseley
Alabama Political Reporter

Tuesday, June 30, the President of the Southern Poverty Law Center Richard Cohen publicly demanded that Alabama Chief Justice Roy Moore (R) fire the director of legal staff for the Administrative Office of Courts, Win Johnson, for a letter he wrote to Alabama Governor Robert Bentley (R). In the letter, Johnson suggested that Alabama officials should somehow defy Friday’s US Supreme Court ruling in Obergefell v. Hodges declaring that marriage is a fundamental right and that the states are obligated to issue marriage licenses to same sex couples.
Read More

Sessions Launches Blistering Attack on Supreme Court’s Gay Marriage Ruling

June 27, 2015

 

By Brandon Moseley
Alabama Political Reporter

US Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Alabama) said that the founders did not authorize judges to amend the constitution in response to the landmark US Supreme Court order claiming that the 1865 14th amendment redefined marriage.

Senator Sessions wrote, “The Supreme Court has become a Supreme Legislature. They have not only rewritten the laws of the 50 United States, but have redefined a sacred and ancient institution. The Framers provided only two means of amending the Constitution: an amendment must be proposed through either a two-thirds vote of the House and Senate or a constitutional convention called for by two-thirds of the states, and either must then be ratified by three-fourths of the states. They did not authorize judges to amend the Constitution. Five judges have neither the moral nor legal authority to decide for themselves that the heritage which gave birth to our nation should be supplanted with their own fleeting views of contemporary events.”
Read More

Roy Moore to Speak to Kimberly Church on Sunday

June 27, 2015

 

By Brandon Moseley
Alabama Political Reporter

Alabama Chief Justice Roy Moore (R) will be speaking to the congregation at the Kimberly Church of God on June 28. During this “God & Country Celebration”, Chief Justice Moore will speak about embattled America, traditional marriage, family values  and will lead a prayer service for our nation.

Following the United States Supreme Court ruling on Friday in Obergefell v. Hodges the conservative Chief Justice has made national headlines for his remarks.
Read More

Bill To Take State Out Of Marriage License Business Fails in Committee

June 4, 2015

By Brandon Moseley
Alabama Political Reporter

Wednesday, June 3, the House Judiciary Committee considered what the response will be from the State of Alabama when (as almost everyone expects at this point) the US Supreme Court rules that Alabama’s restriction against same sex marriage is unconstitutional.

The State Senate passed controversial legislation, SB377, sponsored by Senator Greg Albritton (R-Bay Minette) that would end marriage licensing in Alabama.

Sen. Albritton said, “This bill does not denigrate marriage. This bill does not de-sanctify marriage. This bill does not change the definition of marriage. All my bill does is to change the procedure for individuals to obtain a marriage.”

Albritton said that currently you go to the Probate Judges office to get a marriage license from the state of Alabama, this bill just removes the licensure part out of the process. This bill does not de-sanctify marriage, because the state can not sanctify marriage. Albritton’s bill would make it where you simply fill out a form with the signatures of the two people being married, the person performing the procedure, and two witnesses.

Sen. Albritton said that there are three versions of this bill: the version originally passed by the Senate, the first substitute which is favored by this body, and a second substitute written by Albritton. The conservative Senator said that he had problems with the first substitute because itt keeps the licensure process and the second problem with it is that it does not state that it does not affect any other domestic law. “I have prepared my own substitute that goes a little farther. We are running out of time…There is no secret as to what is going on upstairs (in the Senate where many of whom want to leave and shut the session down early)…The Supreme Court is going to make a ruling very shortly. What I am trying to accomplish is to fix the chaos that we have now. If SB377 is passed then the State will go smoothly into this without further litigation. My goal is not to protect a group my goal is to protect the State.”

House Judiciary Committee Chairman Mike Jones (R-Andalusia) asked the committee which of the three version it would like to make a motion on.

State Representative Jim Hill (R-Odenville) said that he would like to make a motion to give a favorable report ton substitute number two.

That motion was seconded by Rep. Paul Beckman (R-Prattville).

Rep. Thad McClammy (D-Montgomery) asked Beckman what happened to the bill we passed out of this committee, HB56 sponsored by Rep. Hill.

HB56 would have established a freedom of conscious right for judges to refuse to marry anyone if that marriage violated their deeply held religious beliefs.

Sen. Albritton said, “HB56 is not close to passing (in the Senate).

Albritton warned that without his legislation that some individuals are determined not to go along (with any court ruling on same sex marriage) and we will be in litigation hand over fist.

Rep. Christopher John England (D-Tuscaloosa) asked, Are we concerned that the Supreme Court is going to rule in favor of same sex marriage and are afraid that people won’t follow the ruling?

Albritton said that purpose of his bill is to get the state out of when marriage occurs.

Rep. England said, “I don’t like preemptive law because expecting someone not to follow the law to make a conscious decision to break the law. If someone is going to make a decision to consciously break the law you are going to have to live with those consequences.”

Sen. Albritton said, “My goal is not to create more criminals or more litigation.”

Rep. Marcel Black (D-Tuscumbia) said that judges take an oath to uphold the law there is currently no discretion currently for that ministerial function of the court. It concerns me that in anticipation of a court ruling that may not be agreed to we expect people to break the law. That disturbs me.

Sen. Albritton said, “We as a body have an opportunity to prevent putting people in a difficult position, Even if the Supreme Court rules in favor of Alabama law this bill is still the right thing to do.”

Rep. David Faulkner (R-Birmingham) said, “I want to make sure that this is good regardless of the Supreme Court ruling. I want to make sure that this is the law that we want for the people of Alabama.”

Sen. Albritton said other states are looking at this also.  “I think this is an appropriate path for the people of Alabama. Oklahoma has a bill in the same stage as Alabama.”

Faulkner said I was wondering if the term civil union would not be more appropriate. Marriage can be a sacrament. Was that considered?

Sen Albritton said, “That was not considered appropriate because it did not comply with Alabama law.”

Chairman Jones asked if this changes the legal requirements for marriage.

Albritton said, “All those legal requirements remain in effect.”

Rep. Matt Fridy (R-Montevallo) said, “I really have struggled with this bill. I understand the goal of this is but persons with deeply held religious views would still be required to sign off on same sex marriage when the paper is filed at the probate judge’s office. Is this what we want the the law to be? I am a firm believer that you don’t tear down a fence until you understand why it exists. We don’t know what the Supreme Court is going to go.” Fridy suggested that if the Court ruled against Alabama law that the legislature could still act in a special session. “We know that we will be in a special session.”

Chairman Jones said we are one of the few remaining common law marriage states.  How does this affect that?

Rep. England said what stops someone from refusing to record the contract?  This is a bill that ultimately may not be necessary.

Rep. Merika Coleman-Evans (D-Midfield) said that the bill was “Irresponsible” and that there is the possibility of “unintended consequences.” Coleman-Evans thought there was a possibility that Alabama could be embarrassed nationally by this.

Sen. Albritton said that divorce, child custody, common law marriage are excluded and would not change.

Rep. Hill asked if this affected incest.

After a lot of discussion the committee concluded that it would not affect the definition of incest which is in the Alabama criminal code.

The committee vote 3 to 8 on favorable report.

SB377 will not be passed in this legislative session.

 

© Copyright 2017 Alabama Political Reporter