Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?


Two state lawmakers hope one bill can raise revenue, curb smoking

Staff Report
Alabama Political Reporter

With a looming budget crisis and a large population of unhealthy smokers, Alabama could find a partial solution to both problems in taxes, some advocates and politicians say.

Alabama has one of the nation’s highest rates of cigarette smoking, known to cause many health problems and raise medical costs in the process. The state is also facing a projected $400 million deficit in its next budget due to the loss of federal stimulus money.

To some medical experts and anti-smoking advocates, raising taxes on cigarettes could address both problems at once — discouraging people from buying more cigarettes in the long run while generating more revenue for state coffers in the short run.

“I’m not a big tax guy, but this is one tax I can support,” said Dr. William Bailey, professor of medicine in the Lung Health Center and eminent scholar chair in pulmonary diseases at the University of Alabama at Birmingham. “It actually provides an increase for tax revenue and the only negative impact is on smokers … keeping them from buying more cigarettes.”

According to the American Lung Association, at 42.5 cents per pack, Alabama has the fifth-lowest excise tax on cigarettes in the United States. And according to the National Cancer Institute, Alabama has the seventh-highest rate of smoking in the United States at 22.5 percent of the population.

In contrast, California has an 87-cent tax on each pack of cigarettes and has a smoking rate of 12.8 percent.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

Read More…

The Alabama Political Reporter is a daily political news site devoted to Alabama politics. We provide accurate, reliable coverage of policy, elections and government.

More from APR


If passed in its drafted form, the items would become exempt from sales and use tax in October 2024.


Chicago-based Verano Holdings was given the commission's No. 1 rating under its scoring scheme.


SB65 would have cut the occupational tax in certain cities down to 1 percent gradually over time, virtually eliminating it.


This a major victory for those concerned about government transparency and accountability.