Connect with us


Mo Brooks Takes Stand Against Worsening Debt Crisis With “NO” Vote on Continuing Resolution

Brandon Moseley



By Brandon Moseley
Alabama Political Reporter

U.S. Representative Mo Brooks (R) from Huntsville voted “No” on the Continuing Resolution, H.J.R. 117. In a written statement Brooks said that he opposes “Stop and Go” funding that harms defense, NASA, and government contractors Washington, D.C. – Today Rep. Mo Brooks (AL-05) voted “no” on Continuing Resolution H.J.Res 117, yet another temporary government funding measure. Congressman Brooks voted “no” because of the cumulative effect of harmful H.J.Res. 117 provisions.

Rep. Brooks said, “I voted against this six-month Continuing Resolution because of the cumulative effect of harmful H.J.Res 117, provisions. These include, but are not limited, to the following: “First, and foremost, America is in its fourth consecutive, unsustainable trillion-dollar deficit. Last week, America’s total debt blew through the $16 trillion mark. Admiral Mike Mullen, former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, testified to the House Armed Services Committee in 2011 that the greatest threat to America’s national security is its accumulated debt. I take Admiral Mullen’s warning seriously. Remarkably, H.J.Res. 117 increases federal government spending by billions of dollars America does not have.”

Rep. Brooks continued, “Spending increases are the exact opposite of what Washington must do to minimize America’s risk of insolvency and bankruptcy. H.J.Res. 117 is simply not up to the challenge of reining in Washington’s out-of-control spending. “Second, Continuing Resolutions, by their very nature, damage the Department of Defense, NASA, and countless private sector contractors and businesses. Temporary funding deprives agencies and contractors of the ability to plan long-term, make sound financial decisions, and hire new employees. For example, under a continuing resolution, the federal government cannot normally start new programs, thus trapping defense research and development in the past and hindering use of the latest technological breakthroughs. America deserves budgets and spending bills that cover full years. “Third, the Continuing Resolution fails to address or prevent sequestration’s draconian defense cuts, ensuing national security damage, and the estimated loss of 38,000 Alabama jobs. Our Constitution makes national defense the federal government’s number one responsibility. This Continuing Resolution fails to fulfill that responsibility.”

Rep. Brooks concluded, “Finally, the Continuing Resolution continues to spend billions of dollars that America does not have on foreign aid to countries that do not share our respect for basic civil rights like freedom of religion and freedom of speech. I strongly oppose spending billions of hard-earned taxpayer dollars on countries that do not fully appreciate America’s values or sacrifices of our treasury and lives on their behalf. Congress should pass a full-year budget and accompanying appropriations bills. City, county, and state governments do that. Congress can as well, but will not, so long as we pass temporary funding measures.”

Prior to the Obama administration, the administration would send a budget to Congress, the House would either make changes to that budget or write their own budget, the budget would go to the Senate who would either accept the House’s recommendation with modifications or write their own and send it back to the House, the President would threaten to veto the budget unless it included his administration’s priorities. There was always a lot of partisan strife; but at the end of the process, the House passed a budget, the Senate signed off on it, and the President signed the budget into law. The Obama administration budgets have been so unrealistic that neither the House nor the Senate could support their recommendations. While the House has passed budgets written by Congressman Paul Ryan’s Committee, the Senate has rejected the President’s budgets, not acted on the House budgets, and elected not to write their own budget. Instead of the normal budget process, Congress keeps passing Continuing Resolutions to keep doing what they are doing, despite the fact that the budget deficit have been over a $trillion a year throughout President Obama’s presidency.

The National Debt has soared to $16,032 billion.

Congressman Mo Brooks represents Alabama’s Fifth Congressional District. He is seeking a second term. His Democratic opponent is Huntsville Reverend Charlie Holley.


Brandon Moseley is a senior reporter with six and a half years at Alabama Political Reporter. You can email him at [email protected] or follow him on Facebook.



Alabama exploring empty hotels to bolster hospital bed capacity

Chip Brownlee



Gov. Kay Ivey said on a conference with lawmakers and state officials Monday that the state and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers are considering using hotels, especially in Alabama’s large metro areas, to expand hospital bed capacity.

The discussions come as public health experts warn that hospitals could face a surge in patients as the coronavirus pandemic spreads in Alabama and hospitals begin reporting more hospitalizations.

“The governor continues to explore all options to combat COVID-19,” the governor’s press secretary, Gina Maiola, said when APR asked about the plans. “A decision has not been finalized, but her priority remains focused on the health, safety and well-being of all Alabamians.”

On the conference call Monday, Ivey told lawmakers that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is visiting the city’s major metro areas to study facilities that could be used to provide extra hospital bed capacity if a surge in patients materializes, according to several lawmakers and elected officials who were on the call.

Ivey said on the call that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is looking at ways it can contract with empty hotels to expand hospital bed capacity quickly to avoid an overwhelming of the state’s medical facilities with COVID-19 patients.

The Corps of Engineers is surveying potential sites in Tuscaloosa County, Lee County, Birmingham, Mobile, Montgomery and Huntsville. The discussions seem to mirror a nationwide plan being discussed by leaders of the Army Corps of Engineers.

It’s not clear when any of these popup hospitals could be functional in Alabama. More information or some kind of report on the possibility of using the hotels is expected by the end of the week, lawmakers who listened to the call said. But that would only be the first step of the process.

States across the country are looking at hotels — largely empty during the economic shutdown — as potential venues to bolster bed capacity. Washington purchased motels to add bed capacity early on its outbreak. The Army Corps of Engineers, according to McClatchy, explored using hotels in New York City.


The Corps then played a large role in New York, setting up a number of temporary hospitals at convention centers, colleges and other sites in the city, which is now the epicenter of a national outbreak.

The commanding general of the Army Corps of Engineers, Lt. Gen. Todd Semonite, told Fox News that residents of other parts of the country can expect to see pop-up field hospitals like those appearing in New York City.

The hotels, officials said, would be the easiest to convert into extra hospital bed capacity because there are already individual bathrooms for each room and often air conditioning and heat for each individual room.

Continue Reading


State health department confirms 13 COVID-19 deaths

Chip Brownlee



The Alabama Department of Public Health, after investigations into causes of death, has confirmed 13 COVID-19 deaths in the state. The department reported the deaths Tuesday morning.

Three deaths have been confirmed in Chambers County, two in Lee, two in Shelby, one in Jackson, one in Lauderdale, one in Mobile, one in Madison, one in Montgomery and one in Tallapoosa.

The department will continue investigating deaths to determine the primary cause of death.

East Alabama Medical Center over the weekend and on Monday reported seven deaths, including five in Chambers County and two in Lee County. Most of those, but not all, appear to have been confirmed by the state health department.

“In public health, we have to all make sure that we’re counting things the same way from state to state and we have fairly precise processes and definitions so that we all make sure that we are counting the same things,” state health officer Scott Harris said last week when asked about the state’s process for reporting deaths.

People might sometimes die from acute respiratory distress or cardiac arrest, but the primary cause of death must be determined before the state will report the death.

“It does take a little bit of time to review medical records to talk to people who were caring for that patient,” Harris said.

Continue Reading


Department of Public Health says employee has tested positive for COVID-19

Chip Brownlee



The Alabama Department of Public Health says that an employee at the state’s Bureau of Clinical Laboratories in Montgomery has tested positive for the virus.

The BCL is the main lab working on testing for the virus in the state, but ADPH says the individual had no interaction with others on the job and was not working on COVID-19 testing.

The ADPH said the employee tested positive after a laboratory test.

“The employee and staff working in close contact with the employee have been sent home for isolation,” the ADPH said in a statement. “In addition to the area where the employee worked, the entire building is being cleaned and disinfected according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention regulations.”

ADPH has been taking proactive steps to reduce the risk of infection among its workforce, the department said in a statement.

“These steps have included encouraging sick employees to stay home, increasing the frequency of cleaning facilities, canceling meetings and staff travel, increasing the use of teleworking among staff, and encouraging social distancing and other preventive measures,” the department’s statement read.

Continue Reading

Featured Columnists

Opinion | The “mainstream media” has been right all along

Josh Moon



The mainstream media is just blowing this whole coronavirus thing out of proportion!

Have you heard that one? Possibly from a guy standing behind a podium that has the presidential seal attached to it? Or from one of your friends or family members? Or maybe you believe it yourself. 

It’s all “the mainstream media,” the story goes. 

They’re the ones sensationalizing this virus that kills less people than car wrecks and seasonal flu. “The mainstream media” is whipping everyone into a frenzy, causing people to go buy up all the toilet paper and bottled water — all over a virus that has a 99-percent recovery rate. It’s the mainstream media’s fault that businesses are being closed and shelter-in-place orders are being needlessly issued by kneejerk politicians. 

Pfft. Stupid mainstream media. 

Except, one small thing: “The mainstream media” — whatever faceless, unidentifiable group of journalists to which you have assigned that designation — have been right. 

The mainstream folks who work for your local newspapers and TV stations and online news outlets, and for the major national outlets, such as the New York Times, Washington Post and others, have provided the public with incredibly accurate information about this virus. 

I don’t want to spend too much time singing our praises here, but APR is a perfect example of this. The collection of information compiled by our reporters has been better, more informative and far more accurate than even the information supplied by the Alabama Department of Public Health. I’ve heard personally from several lawmakers who check what they’re being told by the governor’s office and ADPH against what we’re reporting. 


Other outlets in this state are doing similar work and providing their local communities with relevant, specific information and tells the story of this crisis in the places they live. 

The reason mainstream outlets have been so successful and accurate in telling this story is mostly because we’ve done nothing but quote and cite the comments and work of reputable, respected doctors and scientists. We have presented you with their projections, their analyses, their breakdowns and their advice. 

Back in early February, when President Pompous was telling everyone not to worry, that all is well and that soon we’d be “down to zero cases,” the mainstream media, citing doctors and health experts, told you that was crazy talk and that a real crisis was approaching this country. That soon we should expect a new normal. 

I think we know who was right about that one.  

As President My Uncle Was A Super-Genius was telling you that one day this will just disappear, the mainstream media was telling you to wash your hands, stay inside and avoid crowds. Because doing so could prevent a scenario in which American hospitals were overrun with patients, depleting our limited supply of ventilators. (The first ventilator story I can find came way back in January.)

And it was the mainstream media that first told you to expect a death toll that reaches into the six figures, and possibly beyond. 

Of course, like all things, the reality of the crisis — and the facts and verifiable information — was lost in the political fight, and in the disinformation campaign required to prop up the dumbest presidential administration in history. 

Because the president took, per usual, such an anti-science, anti-facts position from the outset, any confirmation of the facts that were long ago predicted by the doctors and scientists, and adopted by the mainstream media and most progressive politicians, had to be debunked or reframed in a manner that undercut the severity of the virus or the potential for death. 

And so, on everyone’s favorite phony news network, there came an endless stream of false equivalencies and partial information — all of which were adopted by most Republicans and spread throughout their social media worlds — to the point that those who live within the conservative news bubble have been left believing that the entire country has been shut down by a simple, flu-like virus that is less deadly than seasonal flu and could probably be treated with aquarium cleaner. 

And that the shutdown is being carried out, of course, to tear down the economy (that Obama built and Trump takes credit for) in the hopes of defeating an incumbent president (that had the worst approval ratings in history and trailed by double digits in the polls — including in swing states — to the presumptive Democratic nominee). 

It’s so stupid it hurts. And that’s actually true this time. 

The love that half of America has for being told what they want to hear instead of the actual news is now literally causing death and illness. And it’s going to get worse. 

Even ol’ President Open By Easter is now conceding that this virus will likely kill upwards of 100,000 Americans in the short term, and maybe many more. Somehow, in his mind, that is a victory for him. 

In reality, there are no victories. Not for the people of this country. Not for the mainstream media. And certainly not for the buffoons who have again discounted science and doctors to adopt and espouse a viewpoint built around political advantage and personal ignorance.  

In the coming months, as the reality of this unprecedented disaster unfolds, it should not be lost that so much of it could have been avoided if the American president had relied on facts and science and if many in the American public hadn’t been so quick to choose political preference over hard news. 

Continue Reading



The V Podcast