Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

News

McCutcheon Victorious as Supreme Court Strikes Down Campaign Limits

By Brandon Moseley
Alabama Political Reporter

Fox News is reporting that today, April 2, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in a 5-4 decision that limits on the total amount of money individuals can give to candidates, political parties and political action committees are unconstitutional.  The ruling removes the cap on contributions, which was set at $123,200 for 2014, but does not change limits on individual contributions for president or Congress, currently set at $2,600 per election.

Chief Justice John Roberts wrote in his majority opinion, “Money in politics may at times seem repugnant to some, but so too does much of what the First Amendment vigorously protects.  If the First Amendment protects flag burning, funeral protests and Nazi parades – despite the profound offense such spectacles cause – it surely protects political campaign speech despite popular opinion.”

The overall limits “intrude without justification on a citizen’s ability to exercise `the most fundamental First Amendment activities,”‘ Roberts said, quoting from the court’s 1976 campaign finance ruling in Buckley v. Valeo.

Justice Clarence Thomas said that the Court did not go far enough and wiped away all contribution limits.

Justice Stephen Breyer writing a dissent said, “The decision eviscerates our nation’s campaign finance laws.”

Prominent Alabama businessman, engineer, and conservative activist Shaun McCutcheon gave the symbolically significant $1,776 to 15 candidates for Congress and wanted to give the same amount to 12 more candidates but was barred from doing so by the existing law.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

The case is McCutcheon v. FEC, 12-536

Alabama Republican Party Chairman Bill Armistead said of Facebook, “The Alabama Republican Party is so thankful and proud to have Republicans like Shaun McCutcheon fighting to protect our First Amendment rights! This decision will have a massive impact on this year’s elections; donors will no longer be forced to pick between the candidates and committees they want to support. It does not permit any more money to be given to an individual candidate or party. It only respects the Constitutional right of individuals to decide how many candidates to support.”

Chairman Armistead said in a written statment, “Shaun’s dedication to his beliefs and determination was key to this momentous ruling; this is a tremendous win for the First Amendment!  I am thankful that the Republican National Committee joined with Shaun in this lawsuit to untie the hands of donors who have the ability to give to multiple candidates.” We are so thankful and proud of the work Shaun McCutcheon has done for his country! Congratulations!”

Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus said, “Today’s Court decision in McCutcheon v FEC is an important first step toward restoring the voice of candidates and party committees and a vindication for all those who support robust, transparent political discourse. I am proud that the RNC led the way in bringing this case and pleased that the Court agreed that limits on how many candidates or committees a person may support unconstitutionally burden core First Amendment political activities. When free speech is allowed to flourish, our democracy is stronger.”

Alabama Young Republican Chairman Clayton Mark Turner said on Facebook, “Congrats to an all around good guy and a great friend, Shaun McCutcheon on his big day. Proud of him for leading the way on this issue. Regardless of who tries to take credit, it was Shaun who made this happen. Congrats buddy.”

McCutcheon and his legal team argued that political contributions are speech and thus are protected by the First Amendment. Just as someone is free to speak out against multiple congressional candidates, McCutcheon argued before the court that he has the right to give as much money as he wants to as many candidates he chooses and existing limits on the number of campaigns he can donate to and the aggregate amount that he can give are an unreasonable and unconstitutional burden.

McCutcheon told the New York Times that Americans should spend more on politics not less.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

Currently an individual can contribute only $2,600 per federal candidate in an election and can not give more than $32,400 to a political party. Individuals are also limited in both the aggregate amount that they can give total ($123,200) and in the number of campaigns they may donate to.  The limit of $2,600 remains after today’s decision.

U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia said that aggregate limits have a “consequence, to sap the vitality of political parties.”

The FEC was defended unsuccessfully by U.S. Solicitor General, Bob Verilli.

Brandon Moseley
Written By

Brandon Moseley is a senior reporter with over nine years at Alabama Political Reporter. During that time he has written 8,297 articles for APR. You can email him at [email protected] or follow him on Facebook. Brandon is a native of Moody, Alabama, a graduate of Auburn University, and a seventh generation Alabamian.

DIG DEEPER

Legislature

The bill authorizes the secretary of state's office to audit the 2022 election results of three Alabama counties.

Congress

The Department of Defense said that the strikes were against an Iranian-backed militia position in Syria.

Opinion

"The contributions of engineers are literally everywhere and benefit everyone."

Congress

"We firmly believe the authority to legislate and regulate these changes should be left with the states," the secretaries wrote.