Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?


Judge Says Davis Has Authority, Hubbard’s Attorney Questions Judge

By Bill Britt
Alabama Political Reporter
MONTGOMERY— On Friday, Circuit Court Judge, Jacob A Walker III, denied Rep. Barry Moore’s motion to dismiss the felony case against him in Lee County.
In his order, Judge Walker also released a letter showing were Attorney General Luther Strange has given W. Van Davis the authority to act on the Attorney General’s behalf in, “the State’s interests in the current investigative matters relating to State Representative Mike Hubbard…to include all criminal matters arising from that investigation.”
However, Hubbard’s white collar criminal defense lawyer, J. Mark White, isn’t buying Judge Walker’s decision, according to a report by the Associated Press.
Speaker of the House Mike Hubbard, R-Auburn, has been mentioned, not only in the Moore indictment, but in the conviction and plea agreement of disgraced lawmaker, Rep. Greg Wren, R-Auburn, as well. But, Hubbard and his defense lawyer, J. Mark White, have continued to argue that Hubbard was not a part of these investigations.
The letter attached to Judge Walker’s order makes it abundantly clear that Hubbard has been the subject of the criminal investigation from the start.
Of course Hubbard and White have also tried to spin their argument by saying that the investigation is a political witch hunt. While denying Hubbard’s involvement they would simultaneously have the public believe that the whole affair is concocted to damage Hubbard politically. The position of Hubbard and White would seem to lack any real cognitive consistency.
One of the arguments made by Moore’s attorney, Bill Baxley, was that Davis who was appointed acting Attorney General on January 31, 2013, did not have standing before the court. And therefore the entire Grand Jury proceedings were illegal.
 The Judge dismissed that argument saying, “The Court accepted an in camera document from the State which supports the position that Mr. Davis was appointed by the Attorney General to assume oversight of a legislative corruption investigation on or around January 31st, 2013, as well as any criminal matters arising from that investigation. Furthermore, the letter informs Mr. Davis that the chief of the special prosecution division will report directly to him. These actions appear to be supported by the authority of sections 12-17-184(10), 12-17-216 and 36-15-15 of the Code of Alabama. A redacted copy of the letter which was filed under seal is attached to this order as Exhibit A.”

Hubbard’s attorney questioned Judge Walker ruling according to an AP report, “His [Hubbard’s] attorney, Mark White, said Friday the letter raises more questions than it answers about whether Davis was properly appointed to oversee the investigation. He said that a section of state law the attorney general cited in the letter only refers to appointing active district attorneys, not former district attorneys, to help with investigations.”
White insinuates that the law applies only to “active district attorneys, not former district attorneys.” What White omits is the fact that Davis is a supernumerary district attorney.

This appears to be an attempt to spin the facts not only for the public,  while disparaging the judge’s order. Perhaps White hopes to continue this argument before the Alabama Court of Appeals.
White continues to spend the facts implying that Davis has no standing to conduct the investigation.
Davis, is a supernumerary District Attorney from St. Clair County.

A supernumerary is someone who has retired from their full-time court position, but continues to work on a part-time or as needed basis. Certainly, even White knows that a supernumerary is always available to be called back into action and never truly, inactive in the eyes of the State.

But as one observer said during the Moore motion dismiss  hearing, “When a client is guilty, never argue that they are innocent. Argue about the law.”
As far as the case against Moore/Hubbard being political motivated, Judge Walker’s action in delaying his ruling until after the June primaries should put an end to that argument; but, it most likely will not.
White and at least 4 other attorneys working with him were on hand during the Moore hearing to dismiss.  Many believe that White is managing both cases in a coordinated effort to exonerate Hubbard.

Insiders say it was Rob Riley, the son of former Gov. Bob Riley, who recommended White to represent Hubbard and that White put forward Baxley as attorney for Moore. Both former Gov. Riley and Hubbard have contributed heavily to Moore’s campaign fund, from which he has been paying his attorney’s fees.
Judge Walker dismissed all the arguments that Baxley made on Moore’s behalf, citing extensive case law.
Moore’s trial is set for September 15.
The question remains, will Baxley (on White’s orders) appeal Judge Walker’s ruling and if so will the Court of Appeals uphold the lower court actions?
In many quarters, there is a persistent current of distrust for the State’s judicial system. Speaker Hubbard is on record saying, “We have nine of nine justices,” on the State Supreme Court. That has been taken to mean that courts heavily weighted with Republican jurists can be counted on to favor Republican causes, or defendants,  despite the law.
Could this be what Hubbard and White are counting on? Does Hubbard’s think that the Alabama judicial system is corrupt?
The men and women who sit on the Court of Appeals have sworn an oath to uphold the law. There is no reason to believe that they would shrink from their duty. However, there is a general belief that party politics trump justice.
Judge Walker handed the Moore camp a stunning defeat on Friday. He also opened the State’s eyes to the on going criminal investigation of Speaker Hubbard.
White has questioned Judge Walker.
Time will tell how that works out for his client and if the State courts are based on the rule of law, or the party of men.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.
Written By

Bill Britt is editor-in-chief at the Alabama Political Reporter and host of The Voice of Alabama Politics. You can email him at [email protected] or follow him on Twitter.



The was a hearing without notice, a motion without opposition and redactions that could leave the public in the dark.

Featured Opinion

The public deserves to know the names of those who aided Hubbard and those who resisted his entreaties.

Featured Opinion

No matter the costs. No matter the friendships lost. No matter the ethical lines crossed. Mike Hubbard will protect Mike Hubbard.


The local route — calling on local officials and holding them accountable — is often the best path for citizens to get what they...