Connect with us

News

State Supreme Court dismisses Zeigler challenge of STAARS software contract

Brandon Moseley

Published

on

Friday, the Alabama Supreme Court ruled that there is no legal path for State Auditor Jim Zeigler (R) to seek restitution to taxpayers for the unbid $47 million STAARS contract. Zeigler has argued that the $47 million unbid contract for software is an apparent violation of state bid laws.

Zeigler filed suit in 2016 challenging then Governor Robert Bentley’s (R) decision to enter into an unbid contract with CGI Technologies and Solutions to install a financial software package called State of Alabama Accounting Resources System, or STAARS.

After Zeigler filed the suit, the state canceled the controversial STAARS contract. STAARS was terribly ineffective (when it worked at all) according to several sources in state government. The state then hired a new software vendor, Infiniti, through a competitive bid process.

Zeigler’s legal team said in a release that while his suit failed to get any money back for the state’s taxpayers, it did result in cancellation of the STAARS contract by the Bentley administration.

An attorney for Zeigler said they would ask the court for a rehearing.

“It seems kind of curious that it’s obvious the competitive bid law was violated when the contract was e into but there’s nothing you can do to rectify that wrong,” Susan Copeland said.

The state did not seek bids for the project but creatively got around the bid law by amending an existing 30-year old contract. In 2012, the state amended the 1982 contract to extend the software license by 15 years.

Advertisement

Starting in 2013, the Robert Bentley administration used a series of additional amendments to the 1982 contract to purchase the STAARS software and services from CGI, rather than seek new bids.

Advertisement

Zeigler’s lawsuit maintains that the original 1982 contract with American Management Systems expired in 1997 and that the new software system and services should have been competitively bid by the Bentley administration.

The opinion notes that state law authorizes taxpayers to legally challenge contracts they believe were awarded in violation of the bid law. But it says the law authorizing those challenges only allows a court to stop the execution of a contract and provides no remedy after a contract is complete.

Jim Zeigler was a very vocal critic of the Bentley administration. His efforts to make Bentley testify before an Auditor’s inquest were blocked by then Alabama Attorney General Luther Strange (R). Bentley later appointed Strange to the U.S. Senate. Undeterred Zeigler and 2014 gubernatorial candidate Stacy George filed complaints with the Alabama Ethics Commission alleging that Bentley broke state ethics and finance laws. The Ethics Commission agreed that crimes likely had been committed and forwarded the case to the Montgomery County District Attorney. Bentley resigned and pled guilty to misdemeanor campaign finance law violations on the opening day of the impeachment hearings by the House Judiciary Committee.

Zeigler is seeking another term as state Auditor but faces a stiff challenge from Miranda Karrine Joseph (D) who is running as the Democratic nominee for Auditor for the third election in a row.

The general election is on November 6.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Authors

Advertisement

The V Podcast

Facebook

.