Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Featured Opinion

Opinion | Alabama is “reopening” on Monday, but not because things are better

Things are not better. 

COVID-19 has not slowed its spread throughout the state of Alabama. It is not easing. Numbers are not down. In fact, more new cases were reported a couple of days last week than ever before. 

From what I can tell, not a single benchmark set by the Trump White House has been achieved in this state. 

And yet, on Friday, Gov. Kay Ivey held a press conference at which she told Alabamians that we’re basically reopening everything, because, “I know how the people of Alabama are responding and paying attention while heeding the good public safety health warnings.” 

That’s absurd. 

And it’s unsafe. 

Look, I have taken a position on this virus — and the response to it — that is much more relaxed and middle ground than almost all of my friends on the left. 

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

I think the initial lockdowns were necessary to stop our hospitals from being overrun and to prevent massive casualties, and I think the directives to socially distance, wash your hands frequently, don’t touch your face, wear a mask and protect vulnerable people are very, very important. 

But this isn’t a zombie virus. 

Contracting it doesn’t mean certain death. In fact, for 99-plus-percent of the population, it doesn’t mean death. For about 90 percent of even the people who get it, coronavirus doesn’t even mean hospitalization. 

Now, this isn’t an argument to kill off nursing home patients so we can get our 401Ks back on track. I don’t care about the complicated money aspect of this. 

I care about the simple money aspect. 

The one in which good, hardworking people are going broke. They’re looking at losing their homes, their cars and everything they’ve worked for. They’re standing in food lines for hours. They’re scared to death and haven’t slept in days. They’re driving their kids all over the county to find a free lunch program that’s still serving. 

Those people matter too. And it is absolutely fair for a governor — or any other leader — to consider the enormous weight of their plight. 

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

But that’s not really what Gov. Kay Ivey did on Friday. Or, at least, that’s not the message she truly pushed. 

In a way, I get it. For a couple of weeks now, Ivey has been telling us that data and specific benchmarks would determine our “reopening” in Alabama. And she specifically mentioned those White House guidelines as a good place to start. 

What do you say now that you’re going to reopen without hitting any of those?

Because we haven’t hit a single one of them. 

We don’t have a 14-day or 7-day downward trajectory in symptoms or cases, and we sure don’t have a “robust” anything having to do with testing people. Those are the White House guidelines, and we haven’t met a one of them. 

So, there wasn’t much for Ivey to say. And instead of going with the simple, unvarnished truth, she tried a lie to sugarcoat things. 

There is not a soul in this state — even those who are clamoring to “reopen” it — who could look you in the eye and tell you that Alabamians have done a good job “heeding” the public health orders. 

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

The data and our growing case numbers say otherwise. And if you’ve been to pretty much any Lowe’s or Walmart in the past two months, you know how absurd that statement is. 

It’s also irresponsible.

That comment from Ivey — along with her decision to reopen almost everything — leads the public to believe that things are better, that the threat is lessened. After all, why else would the governor be saying that AND reopening things? 

It doesn’t matter that Ivey came back later and tried to impress upon people that they needed to continue to take the virus seriously, that the threat isn’t over. 

The damage was done. 

And all the while, the less pleasant — but more realistic — truth sat unused. 

Ivey could have told the people of this state that the crushing economic reality was driving everyday Alabamians to the poor house. That food banks are low on supplies. That there might not be enough food stamp money to go around. That their neighbors are on the verge of living in their car. 

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

She could have told them that reopening was risky and far less than ideal. She could have told them that the virus was spreading worse than ever before in this state but that our hospitals have said they can handle the fallout, and that’s really why we’re lifting the stay-at-home order. 

It wouldn’t have been the prettiest of explanations. It probably wouldn’t have made a lot of business owners happy. It wouldn’t have necessarily made things much better. 

But at least it would have been the truth.

 

Josh Moon
Written By

Josh Moon is an investigative reporter and featured columnist at the Alabama Political Reporter with years of political reporting experience in Alabama. You can email him at [email protected] or follow him on Twitter.

DIG DEEPER

Health

Alabama would need to have 3.5 million people with immunity for the virus's spread to die down on its own.

Legislature

Senate leadership outlines its remaining legislative priorities for the 2021 Legislative Session.

Opinion

"Fortunately, it’s a disaster that Alabama has taken aggressive steps to avoid."

Opinion

"We urge state leaders and lawmakers to act now and provide a lifeline to Alabama residents."