Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Courts

Death Penalty Action releases statement on Alabama judge’s ruling on nitrogen gas execution

The group said Alabama’s use of gas suffocation underscored broader doubts about capital punishment as Lee’s execution date nears.

Death Penalty Action

United States District Judge Emily C. Marks on Tuesday permanently enjoined the state of Alabama from executing Jeffery Lee by nitrogen hypoxia, declaring the method a violation of the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition on cruel punishment. The ruling came hours after the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals ordered Judge Marks to immediately consider whether a firing squad constitutes a feasible alternative. She found that it does.

Statement of Abraham Bonowitz, executive director of Death Penalty Action:

“Death Penalty Action does not take a position on execution methods. We oppose the death penalty in every case because government cannot be trusted to get it right, every time. Alabama has been using gas suffocation because no one told them they could not. Today that’s changed, and we’ll be watching to see if this injunction holds up. Until then, let’s not forget that Jeffrey Lee’s jury voted 7 to 5 to not execute him, and if his trial was today, he would not be on death row.”

The execution of Lee is set to take place during a 30-hour window beginning at midnight on June 11, 2026, and ending early June 12.

The Alabama Political Reporter is a daily political news site devoted to Alabama politics. We provide accurate, reliable coverage of policy, elections and government.

Advertisement
Advertisement

More from APR

Prisons

She urged Governor Kay Ivey to commute or pause the death sentence, citing a jury override and unresolved nitrogen gas litigation.

Courts

U.S. District Judge Emily C. Marks ruled Alabama's nitrogen hypoxia protocol constitutional, rejecting Jeffery Lee's challenge and clearing the way for his June execution.

Congress

The Alabama Democrat called the decision a victory for Black voters and fair representation after judges found intentional discrimination.

Courts

The ruling drew divided reactions, with Republicans cheering states’ rights and Democrats warning of confusion and diluted Black voting power.