Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Courts

Federal court rules Alabama must use map that granted two Democrat seats

Judges said the GOP-backed 2023 plan was tainted by intentional race discrimination and would dilute Black voters’ power.

STOCK
This is a developing story and may be updated.

A three-judge federal panel issued a preliminary injunction Tuesday morning thwarting Alabama’s plan to hold new elections for Congressional districts that Republicans believed could help them gain a seat.

The U.S. Supreme Court had cleared the way for the the state to use a Congressional map lawmakers drew in 2023 despite the same three-judge federal panel finding that the map failed to remedy a Section 2 violation of the Voting Rights Act and intentionally discriminated against Black voters.

The panel on Monday said it could not allow the state to move forward with the 2023 map “tainted by intentional race-based discrimination.”

“After (an) exacting review, we conclude that a preliminary injunction must issue. Ultimately, we cannot see our way clear to requiring Alabamians to cast their votes in the 2026 elections under a districting plan tainted by intentional race-based discrimination,” the judges wrote in their ruling. “And under the unusual circumstances of this case, we conclude that a limited order requiring the Secretary to continue using this Court’s race-blind map will not disrupt Alabama’s elections (all candidates ran under the race-blind map until fifteen days ago, and all voters remain districted under the race-blind map in electoral computer systems).

“…We reject in the strongest possible terms the State’s attempt to finish its intentional decision to dilute minority votes with a veneer of legislative regularity.”

The work of reassigning voters had been set to begin Wednesday, with a short seven-day window to get the work done. That will no longer be taking place as long as the injunction remains in effect.

Jacob Holmes is a reporter. You can reach him at [email protected]

Advertisement
Advertisement

More from APR

Elections

The Ozark native entered a crowded GOP field as Alabama’s disputed congressional maps may reshape the fight for Representative Shomari Figures’ seat.

Courts

Federal judges weighed whether Alabama could revive a disputed congressional map as officials warned voter reassignments faced a punishing timeline.

Courts

The Supreme Court remanded Caster v. Allen to the Northern District of Alabama following its decision in Louisiana v. Callais.

Courts

As Alabama’s congressional map returns to court, Voting Rights Project leader Robert Weiner says new legal hurdles could reshape fights for fair representation nationwide.